F... Kool-Aid

[jamf]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Because over his last four games, his completion % is at 61.3%. In the five games before that, it was 58%. He's improving his accuracy.


Because in the last two games, the line has given up two sacks. In the previous seven games, they gave up 12 sacks.

The stats you provided don't prove much. He has a 61.3% completion percentage on all of his throws. Unfortunately most of those those throws are short routes.

JC has one completion over 50 yards all year. He hasn't completed a pass over 40 yards since week 3. He's missed wide open WR's down field at key points in a game all year. Yet you believe he will start connecting on deep balls because his accuracy on his short throws is decent. Clearly you haven't given your stats any thought.


The redskins have given up 12 sacks all year which isn't bad. but, most of the redskins passing plays are 3 and 5 step drops so JC can get the ball out quickly.
The redskins have only allowed 2 sacks in the last 2 games which doesn't mean much since it was our best rushing outing all year. The redskins dominated the eagles Dline last week. Once the skins gave up the lead and had to pass, they got to JC. if the redskins are in a position where they have to pass, they won't have time for a 7 step drop passing play.

Originally Posted by Schneed10

You think rivalries cause wins? Because weird things happen? This is why you can't simply state a belief AND be taken seriously at the same time. It was a strong rivalry in the late 90s and early 2000s, and we got our ass handed to us 12 straight times or whatever it was. It's a rivalry for the Cowboys too, you know. There is a team on the other side of this rivalry, after all. Couldn't "wierd" things happen in their favor? In the end, you're not saying anything here. You're just hoping. You have to stick with the word "believe" when talking about our chances tomorrow, because you clearly haven't given it any thought.

Absolutely! In the redskins cowboys rivalry, the underdog pulls off upsets. Is it a coincidence that the most unlikely victories/losses in redskins history are against the cowboys? Mark Brunell launching a bomb 50+ yards twice in 1 minute isn't weird? What about the troyvincent fg block that lead to an ST recovery and facemask? On the flip side, what about the cowboys 1 win season, their only win was against an undefeated redskins team that went on to win the superbowl. Let's not even bring up clint longley, the replacements game or any other.

[Southpaw]

Originally Posted by jamf

JC has one completion over 50 yards all year. He hasn't completed a pass over 40 yards since week 3. He's missed wide open WR's down field at key points in a game all year. Yet you believe he will start connecting on deep balls because his accuracy on his short throws is decent. Clearly you haven't given your stats any thought.

The problem with grading Campbell's deep ball accuracy is that he averages about two deep balls a game. The quarterbacks who hit a good number of deep balls miss a lot too. Watch any Pats or Colts game, and you'll see a ton of missed deep passes. The difference is, Brady and Manning take around 5-6 deep shots per game. All they have to do is hit one of them and people think they're great at throwing the deep ball.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by jamf

The stats you provided don't prove much. He has a 61.3% completion percentage on all of his throws. Unfortunately most of those those throws are short routes.

Did his routes get shorter in the last four games compared to the first five? No. The routes are the same. The length of the routes doesn't explain the uptick in accuracy.

Originally Posted by jamf

JC has one completion over 50 yards all year. He hasn't completed a pass over 40 yards since week 3. He's missed wide open WR's down field at key points in a game all year. Yet you believe he will start connecting on deep balls because his accuracy on his short throws is decent. Clearly you haven't given your stats any thought.

Show me where I said he'd start connecting on deep balls. Please don't put words in my mouth. I said Moss and Randle-El on the same field, coupled with Campbell's improved accuracy, could create big plays. The definition of "big play" is not necessarily a bomb over the head of the safeties. Moss and Randle-El have a suddenness and elusiveness to them, they make sudden cuts, and are punt returners when in open space. A short 10-yard hitch can turn into a big play if the ball is delivered on time and accurately.

Originally Posted by jamf

The redskins have given up 12 sacks all year which isn't bad. but, most of the redskins passing plays are 3 and 5 step drops so JC can get the ball out quickly.
The redskins have only allowed 2 sacks in the last 2 games which doesn't mean much since it was our best rushing outing all year. The redskins dominated the eagles Dline last week. Once the skins gave up the lead and had to pass, they got to JC. if the redskins are in a position where they have to pass, they won't have time for a 7 step drop passing play..

Again, who says we need 7 step drops?? Why is that a necessity for a successful passing game? I just can't comprehend this argument.

Originally Posted by jamf

Absolutely! In the redskins cowboys rivalry, the underdog pulls off upsets. Is it a coincidence that the most unlikely victories/losses in redskins history are against the cowboys? Mark Brunell launching a bomb 50+ yards twice in 1 minute isn't weird? What about the troyvincent fg block that lead to an ST recovery and facemask? On the flip side, what about the cowboys 1 win season, their only win was against an undefeated redskins team that went on to win the superbowl. Let's not even bring up clint longley, the replacements game or any other.

So let me get this straight. Because two rare events, namely two TDs to Moss within the last five minutes, and the blocking of a last minute FG, took place within the last three years, that means you think the likelihood of a similar event occurring goes up?

So what should we expect this time? A safety to win the game? A bad snap by the Cowboys on a FG? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. This is what you are basing your belief on, that we'll win because of some fluky wierd event, based on the thinking that we've won two games against them because of wierd events? Sure, I guess it COULD happen. But to believe we're going to win because of one of these RARE events is asinine.

FYI - we've had plenty of wierd wins/losses against teams not named the Cowboys. I remember losing a playoff game against Tampa in 1999 because of a bad snap by our snapper. I remember losing a game to the Eagles in 1991 in which player after player went off injured. I remember a tie game against the Giants in which our QB jammed his neck after headbutting a wall.

Wierd shit happens in football, that doesn't mean that because it's the Cowboys, we're any more likely to see something wierd this weekend. It just makes no sense at all.