Campbell's Shortcoming

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Jason Campbell's had a lot of good games for us, and makes a lot of great throws. But I think this highlights the fact that we're still talking about a young QB who needs time to develop.

I took NFL QB stats, and added together INTs and Fumbles Lost. Campbell leads the NFL in fumbles lost at the QB position. This combined total, essentially amounting to turnovers, was then calculated on a per-game basis.

Here's where Campbell ranks:

Name ,Team, TO PG
Trent Dilfer ,SFO, 2.17
Brian Griese ,CHI, 1.83
Eli Manning ,NYG, 1.75
Damon Huard ,KAN, 1.6
Jason Campbell ,WAS, 1.58
Drew Brees ,NOR, 1.5
Jon Kitna ,DET, 1.5
Philip Rivers ,SDG, 1.5
Vince Young ,TEN, 1.45
Rex Grossman ,CHI, 1.43
Kurt Warner ,ARI, 1.4
Tony Romo ,DAL, 1.33
Carson Palmer ,CIN, 1.33
Marc Bulger ,STL, 1.33
Derek Anderson ,CLE, 1.25
Jay Cutler ,DEN, 1.25
Peyton Manning ,IND, 1.17
Ben Roethlisberger ,PIT, 1.17
Daunte Culpepper ,OAK, 1.14
Kellen Clemens ,NYJ, 1.14
Matt Schaub ,HOU, 1.09
Brett Favre ,GNB, 1.08
Matt Hasselbeck ,SEA, 1.08
Donovan McNabb ,PHI, 1
Chad Pennington ,NYJ, 1
J.P. Losman ,BUF, 1
Kyle Boller ,BAL, 0.9
Tom Brady ,NWE, 0.67
Joey Harrington ,ATL, 0.67
Jeff Garcia ,TAM, 0.45
David Garrard ,JAC, 0.33

Fumbles lost, at least with QBs, is an indicator of line play as much as the QB play. But one of my frustrations with Campbell is that he should be feeling the rush and doing a better job of securing the ball when someone's bearing down on him. That's definitely the part of his game that needs the most improvement.

I think he'll improve over time and be a good one for sure, but this is just kind of a reality check to anyone who thinks JC is our savior today or even next season.

Stats tell us everything and nothing.. He ranks behind such luminary QB as Joey Harrington, JP Losman, Kyle Boller, Kellen Clemens and Rex Grossman.. Ball security is an issue as are his red zone decisions, but that's not enough to serve as a 'reality check' for those of us who think he's the best (present and future) we've had under center in well over 20 years..

[70Chip]

He'll clean the fumble thing up. That's really a function of him trying to make plays down the field right up until the last second which is a good thing. He'll learn when he needs to secure the ball better over time.

What is a concern for me is his propensity to decide which receiver he's going to throw to before the snap and then not come off that guy. The ability to get to second and third reads is the difference between Joe Montana and Tony Banks. It is the single most impoprtant attribute an NFL QB can have. Its' more important than arm strength, mobility, or even accuracy. You have to be able to see the entire field. Sometimes it seems like Campbell has this intangible and other times it seems he doesn't. I guess the jury is still out.

Gibbs has always understood that this quality is a rare one and that is one reason he emphasizes the running game so much. A team that can run the ball can put it's QB in situations where the reads are simpler and his chances for failure are greatly reduced. The offensive line and the running game have done a lousy job (with a few exceptions like the Jets game) of helping the young guy out.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Stats tell us everything and nothing.. He ranks behind such luminary QB as Joey Harrington, JP Losman, Kyle Boller, Kellen Clemens and Rex Grossman.. Ball security is an issue as are his red zone decisions, but that's not enough to serve as a 'reality check' for those of us who think he's the best (present and future) we've had under center in well over 20 years..

Yes, but is it any coincidence that the Jags look so good with Garrard, who is taking care of the ball better than anybody in the league?

[Rajmahal33]

A good offensive line cures ALL woes (including defense).
- running the ball would've given us options in the red zone for these close games instead of having JC try to throw it in.
- it would have given him more time to go through his progressions and see the field better
- it would have allowed for him to work on timing...prevented dropped balls and INT's
- it would have cut down the fumbles and sacks due to a collapsing pocket.
- it would have kept our defense fresher when we controlled TOP

If you really think about it, thats the BEST thing that new england has going for them. Tom brady has as much time as he wants and he throws it 40-50 times a game. The games when teams have gotten through to him is when the pats have looked VERY human. Brady isn't immune to making bad decisions when he is pressured. Their defense is good but not dominant. Their running game is nothing spectacular.

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Yes, but is it any coincidence that the Jags look so good with Garrard, who is taking care of the ball better than anybody in the league?

I guess not, but then explain Joey Harrington 2 places later.. Like I said, stats tell you everything at the same time they tell you nothing.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

I guess not, but then explain Joey Harrington 2 places later.. Like I said, stats tell you everything at the same time they tell you nothing.

Harrington has had a pretty good season, all things considered. He has completed 61.5% of his passes and has NEVER fumbled despite being sacked 32 times. That's ball security.

He hasn't gotten noticed because he has only thrown for 7 TDs. And it's hard to fault him for that given their WR play.

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Harrington has had a pretty good season, all things considered. He has completed 61.5% of his passes and has NEVER fumbled despite being sacked 32 times. That's ball security.

He hasn't gotten noticed because he has only thrown for 7 TDs. And it's hard to fault him for that given their WR play.

He hasn't gotten noticed because he was benched twice and they are awful.. I can't give any list that Joey Harrington is near the leaders in any credibility, sorry.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

He hasn't gotten noticed because he was benched twice and they are awful.. I can't give any list that Joey Harrington is near the leaders in any credibility, sorry.

Paintrain, what is hard to understand here. This is not some sort of ranking of QBs. It's not to say that Joey Harrington is a top 5 QB in the league.

It simply says that Joey Harrington has taken care of the ball really well. It says NOTHING about his ability to make throws or move the ball.

The reason I'm posting it isn't to bring up a debate on where the QBs rank. I'm bringing it up because it shows that Campbell is turning the ball over a lot.

That by no means indicates he's a bad QB. It's just A PART of his game he needs to work on.

[SC Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Yes, but is it any coincidence that the Jags look so good with Garrard, who is taking care of the ball better than anybody in the league?

It's also no coincidence that Garrard threw his first INT last week when the Jags were placed in a position where they had to pass the ball and couldn't rely on the run game. This is also Garrard's 6th season. Last season, in 10 games started, Garrard threw 10 tds/9 ints, had 4 fumbles, 2 lost. I'm confident Jason will come around.

[prinzeofmoval]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

Stats tell us everything and nothing.. He ranks behind such luminary QB as Joey Harrington, JP Losman, Kyle Boller, Kellen Clemens and Rex Grossman.. Ball security is an issue as are his red zone decisions, but that's not enough to serve as a 'reality check' for those of us who think he's the best (present and future) we've had under center in well over 20 years..

plan and simple we dont have a go to guy in the red zone..we have a bunch of speedy recievers but none like the t.o.,moss,andre johnson throw the ball and i get it guys..and with a injured offensive line we cant expect for portis to pound it in.if these werent problems we'd have 5 more wins under our belt i.e. the packers,giants,bucs,eagles and cowboys...only game we actually lost was the patriots game..