The O-Line ain't doing fine

SkinsRock · 10-11-2004, 11:27 AM

As I said on another thread, the O-line is the #1 problem....not protecting the QB and not opening up decent holes for the running game. Because of this, I completely agree with bringing in "the Ramsey cannon." For two main reasons:
1. Samuels may not be quite where he used to be (yet), but he would be a hell of a lot better than Jones/Brown at protecting the blind-side.
2. "The cannon" will be able to get the ball down the field, which will help the running game by keeping them from putting 8 in the box. Ramsey's gun can also get the ball to the receivers quicker, even with shorter passes. Also, I'd much rather see a couple INT's in opposing territory rather than fumbles in ours.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

10-11-2004, 11:27 AM	#7
SkinsRock Impact Rookie Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Crofton, MD Age: 56 Posts: 907	As I said on another thread, the O-line is the #1 problem....not protecting the QB and not opening up decent holes for the running game. Because of this, I completely agree with bringing in "the Ramsey cannon." For two main reasons: 1. Samuels may not be quite where he used to be (yet), but he would be a hell of a lot better than Jones/Brown at protecting the blind-side. 2. "The cannon" will be able to get the ball down the field, which will help the running game by keeping them from putting 8 in the box. Ramsey's gun can also get the ball to the receivers quicker, even with shorter passes. Also, I'd much rather see a couple INT's in opposing territory rather than fumbles in ours.

The O-Line ain't doing fine

Locker Room Main Forum