Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


BENCH Brunell/Theisman? MORE HISTORY!!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2004, 04:11 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
Gibbs won't bench his QB if he believes he's not the source of the problems. And at this point I can't honestly say Brunell is the main source of our offensive struggles and I think Gibbs is probably thinking along the same lines.

Like I said in another thread, my take is Brunell will start again in Chicago. If the offense is just as inept as it's been, Gibbs might not have a choice but to look to shake things up a bit and make a switch at QB.

I don't think this is a case of Gibbs being stubborn, if Ramsey was the clear cut better player he'd be in there already.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:17 PM   #2
Hogskin
Impact Rookie
 
Hogskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hartselle, Alabama
Age: 85
Posts: 659
Thanks, offiss.

Matty, I tend to agree with you. And I really doubt he will make a halftime switch. He also does not seem to like to make mid-game changes. But would be more likely to at the BYE break, if he wants to change.
__________________
John Shaffer
National Fantasy Sports Leagues, Inc.
Home of "The BEST Game In Town" since 1990
Hogskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:19 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,049
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hogskin
Thanks, offiss.

Matty, I tend to agree with you. And I really doubt he will make a halftime switch. He also does not seem to like to make mid-game changes. But would be more likely to at the BYE break, if he wants to change.
That's what I meant, the switch after the bye.

:thumb:
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:30 PM   #4
BIGREDSKINFAN63
Special Teams
 
BIGREDSKINFAN63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bassett-va
Age: 63
Posts: 289
only non injury time i remember gibbs taking a qb out of a game was in 1987 against the lions,when he benched jay schroder and put williams in.then he switched back after a mnf loss to the rams,and made the switch permanent in the last game of the year,which happened to be an overtime victory against the vikings.the rest is skins history.
__________________
"7 days without the redskins, makes one weak!!!"
BIGREDSKINFAN63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:32 PM   #5
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
I'm not saying this would happen, but it can always be spun as an injury induced benching

"Mark just isn't fully healed from his hamstring injury, we think a couple of weeks off (including the bye week) might give him the rest he needs"

Then you just go from there
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:31 PM   #6
SkinsRock
Impact Rookie
 
SkinsRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Crofton, MD
Age: 56
Posts: 907
On the subject of QB switches.....I need a refresher:
In '87 I know that Schroeder was the QB for most of the season, but Williams obviously led the Skins to the SB victory. Was Schroeder hurt or did Gibbs just make the switch?
Any info on this would help....my memory sucks....
SkinsRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:36 PM   #7
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsRock
On the subject of QB switches.....I need a refresher:
In '87 I know that Schroeder was the QB for most of the season, but Williams obviously led the Skins to the SB victory. Was Schroeder hurt or did Gibbs just make the switch?
Any info on this would help....my memory sucks....
I know at one point Schroeder had been hurt, but I don't remember if it was directly linked to him being pulled, Gibb's has the ability to make QB's look more talented than they really are, and other than Theisman he really didn't have a real instinctive QB, he took guy's with strong arm's and made them QB's, well Ramsey is an instinctive QB with all the intangables, he's more talented than any QB Gibb's has had.

Now that I think of it, I think he was pulled, I remember William's coming in the second half of a game and doing pretty well and that's when the controversy started.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2004, 04:32 PM   #8
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
I don't think this is a case of Gibbs being stubborn, if Ramsey was the clear cut better player he'd be in there already.
That might not be the case HG, obviously as we stated with the Theisman, Schroeder, scenerio, but I do think he expected Brunell to much better than he is, is he happy where Brunell is at this point? No, but he may have over estimated the gap between the 2 player's, assuming the veteran would be much better off than a young Ramsey.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.72495 seconds with 11 queries