McCants #85 inactive?

SUNRA · 10-11-2004, 09:55 PM

McCants had to be disgusted with the offseason acquistion of James Thrash. While I really like Thrash, his numbers dropped drastically over three years with the Eagles. Thrash is a help on punt/kick returns. McCants on the other hand was the leader with 6 TD's last year. I really think he allowed his feelings to interfere with his practice. To drop from #3 WR to #5WR and a pretty good performance in preseason it's unfortunate not to see him at all since Barrow is taking up a roster spot. Get Barrow's ass off of the active list. My problem with our receivers is we have only one WR whose big enough to dominate over top of a defender. McCants is big enough to make the big plays and deserves a chance.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

10-11-2004, 09:55 PM	#8
SUNRA The Starter Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 1,680	McCants had to be disgusted with the offseason acquistion of James Thrash. While I really like Thrash, his numbers dropped drastically over three years with the Eagles. Thrash is a help on punt/kick returns. McCants on the other hand was the leader with 6 TD's last year. I really think he allowed his feelings to interfere with his practice. To drop from #3 WR to #5WR and a pretty good performance in preseason it's unfortunate not to see him at all since Barrow is taking up a roster spot. Get Barrow's ass off of the active list. My problem with our receivers is we have only one WR whose big enough to dominate over top of a defender. McCants is big enough to make the big plays and deserves a chance. __________________ Redskins Member since 1970

McCants #85 inactive?

Locker Room Main Forum