Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Short memories from angry fans

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-15-2004, 07:00 PM   #1
wolfeskins
The Starter
 
wolfeskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: chesapeake,va.
Posts: 2,160
i cant throw in the towel on coles just yet,like some of you are doing.he was paid alot of money to come to washington but that was for steve spurriers' system and he had a real good year in it.i remember watching him play last year and thinking to myself ,"that was money well spent" ,he just needs to adjust to gibbs' system, like everyone else.plus he's hurt.
wolfeskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2004, 04:37 AM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
i don't think anyone would be going after dockery... not as a #1... same for gardner and mccants...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 03:45 PM   #3
BIGREDSKINFAN63
Special Teams
 
BIGREDSKINFAN63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: bassett-va
Age: 63
Posts: 289
i would offer the raiders a late 4th or 5th round pick for jerry rice.the recievers on the team now could learn a whole lot from that man.he could also add a new wrinkle to 3rd and 5.
__________________
"7 days without the redskins, makes one weak!!!"
BIGREDSKINFAN63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 12:57 PM   #4
SUNRA
The Starter
 
SUNRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIGREDSKINFAN63
i would offer the raiders a late 4th or 5th round pick for jerry rice.the recievers on the team now could learn a whole lot from that man.he could also add a new wrinkle to 3rd and 5.
An old receiver is certainly not what this team needs. We need a kick off returner, and an offensive lineman.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970
SUNRA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 06:43 PM   #5
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUNRA
An old receiver is certainly not what this team needs. We need a kick off returner, and an offensive lineman.
we got 3 good returners, what we need is BLOCKING!
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 08:35 PM   #6
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
Matty:

Vegas was WONDERFUL! Thanx for asking. I returned home in sensory overload from watching all the NFL games and about 20-25 college football games and all the baseball games over the weekend and horse races from about 2 dozen tracks around the country. Oh, and did I mention that wagering was available on all of them?

For the record, I took the Skins to win and got 1.5 points because by game time the Bears had become the favorite. I also took the game UNDER 34 points. That was easy. And I parlayed those two bets and collected on everything. In addition, I took a first half get that the total score at halftime would be UNDER 18. That game was very good to me!!

I think Dockery could become something useful with the right coaching and the right usage. However, he is slow afoot and you cannot use him in a scheme that requires him to lead a runner downfield on a sweep He's not going to get there this season! My description of someone that slow is that he is likely to be rear-ended by a glacier!

But he is big and he obviously worked hard in the offeason to get rid of a lot of the baby-fat he carried last year so that tells me he has the desire and the "coachability" to improve. So, I don't want the Skins to get rid of him, but I cannot allow someone to say that Dockery belongs on a list of players that a Super Bowl aspirant would trade for to "put them over the top". Hopefully for the Skins he'll develop into that kind of player, but for now, that's just absurd.

Jerry Rice might be a good addition to the team as a role model for the young players regarding conditioning and regarding the "cerebral aspects" of the game. But Jerry Rice is not the pass receiver that he was even three years ago; he will not catch any 6 yard passes over the middle break one tqackle and run 65 yards to the end zone. Those days are behind him. I don't think the Skins have room to have a player like Rice who will demand to play - and complain if he doesn't - but whose skills are no longer what the team needs. For a memory of the recent past, let me say two words here:

Bruce ... Smith !!!
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 04:28 PM   #7
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
rice would hate it here, he's pissed off cause he's not getting the ball... here he'd be the slowest WR on the team... if he wanted to teach, he has plenty of guys to mentor in oakland, that's just not his deal.

no thanks.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 04:38 PM   #8
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
I think Gibbs will make a lot of changes during the bye week. its been a while since hes done it but your cant argue that we are most discipled
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 04:40 PM   #9
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
When did bye weeks start? Gibbs never had that his first time around did he?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 04:46 PM   #10
SKINSnCANES
Pro Bowl
 
SKINSnCANES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 44
Posts: 5,455
i thought they have had it for a long time, I assume they had bye weeks before
__________________
"I'm used to winning, coming from the University of Miami. " Clinton Portis
SKINSnCANES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 06:53 PM   #11
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Yeah I'm pretty sure they had byes back during Gibbs' first run, I even remember one year where there was 2 byes per team
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 10:54 AM   #12
sportscurmudgeon
Playmaker
 
sportscurmudgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
CRT3:

Good thing you post here under a screen name because you just disqualified yourself from any NFL GM job for all time.

The premise was you were going to trade for a Redskin player to put your team over the top to win a conference champinship or the Super Bowl. You thought you were one player short.

So you toss in the names McCants and Dockery? McCants is aptly named because he "mccants" even make the active roster this year; Dockery is "marginally proficient" when you describe him politely. Even his agent would not say he was "the guy you need to make it to the super Bowl next year".

And in case you haven't noticed, teams rarely trade for coaches. sometimes, they sign one away fro a team and have to give away draft choice compensation, but it isn't a trade.
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon
www.sportscurmudgeon.com
But don't get me wrong, I love sports...
sportscurmudgeon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 12:38 PM   #13
Defensewins
Playmaker
 
Defensewins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
Quote:
Originally Posted by sportscurmudgeon
CRT3:

Good thing you post here under a screen name because you just disqualified yourself from any NFL GM job for all time.....So you toss in the names McCants and Dockery? McCants is aptly named because he "mccants" even make the active roster this year; Dockery is "marginally proficient" when you describe him politely. Even his agent would not say he was "the guy you need to make it to the super Bowl next year".
I have to agree, Dockery is not very good. He is slow and makes many mental mistakes. But what is most dissapointing about Dockery is he soft.
For a man as big and strong as he is, he does not posses the killer instinct to level someone. In the years he has been here can you remember a single time when he has been shown on replay making pancake block? No.
Plus Ramsey and Cooley have not proven to be consistently good. They flash in spurts. They are not going to go to another team and make a diffrence enough to take another team to the playoffs or superbowl. They are not that good just yet.
Defensewins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 11:50 AM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
SC how was Vegas?
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2004, 02:40 PM   #15
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Bugel seems to really like Dockery, call me crazy but I'll defer to Boss Hog on personnel decisions involving the line.

He's a 2nd year guy who wasn't even supposed to see the field much in his rookie year. I'd say he's progressing pretty well, he sure looks to be in better shape this year compared to last. Let's let the guy develop a bit more before we draft his replacement.
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.35740 seconds with 11 queries