Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Who will back up Clinton Portis?

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-20-2004, 01:58 AM   #23
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by joecrisp
There's a strong precedent in the history of Gibbs' running game to indicate that Portis will be spelled pretty frequently. Shane posted a great two-part article from KFFL that provides strong evidence to that effect:

http://thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=475
http://thewarpath.net/showthread.php?t=476

That article also points out that Gibbs may have never had a back with Portis' prodigious talents (though many would call that sacrilege, given Riggins' Hall of Fame credentials). But even John Riggins shared a lot of time with Joe Washington. George Rogers shared a lot of carries with Riggins, and later with Kelvin Bryant. Earnest Byner's load was lightened considerably by the combination of Gerald Riggs and Ricky Ervins.

Given the current selection of runningbacks Gibbs has to choose from, I'd say he'll find at least two backs from that group that will allow him to keep Portis fresh-- as one poster put it-- "for the playoff run".

At this point, the Redskins are said to have around $4 million in cap room, and could enter training camp without needing to restructure or cut any salaries-- which could mean that Trung Canidate is safe. But if one or two other horses from this stable are able to get a fast start out of the gates, Canidate's salary would make him the first candidate for the waiver wire.

I agree with Shane, and I believe the darkhorse here is McCullough. He's got the raw talent, and if the coaches can harness it, he could be a factor down the homestretch. He and Canidate are similar in size and speed to Portis, but McCullough's younger and cheaper, so if Sultan struts his stuff in camp, look for him to become the primary backup at some point.

I loved Cartwright's tackle-busting tenacity last season, and Morton showed Bryant-like flashes of 3rd-down lightning. Betts remains mostly a mystery, but I agree that he's built like a prototypical Gibbs back. I hope he has a great camp and emerges as the Davis-like power runner we all envisioned he would be. The Skins would be downright scary with Portis being spelled by a hammering Betts to wear down the defenses.

Mike Sellers could be a monster as an H-back lead blocker. In his first incarnation as a Redskin, he showed a lot of ability in that regard. Let's hope the coaches can retrieve and refine that talent, and keep him out of the legal trouble that threatens to wreck his career. If Sellers and Betts step up, the Heavy Jumbo formation would be ready for action.

One thing's for sure, there are a lot of questions at the backup runningback position this offseason. The coaches get their first look at possible answers when minicamp opens March 26th. I can't wait...
Nice job with that as alway's JC, I agree on mike sellers I alway's thought if used the right way he could be a real find and the way gibb's likes to use his TE's it just may happen, as for the running back situation, one of the thing's that I felt held back gibb's offense during his first tenure was a legitamate home run threat out of the backfield, I alway's felt the gibb's offense was at times held back because of lack of speed from the running back position we would get back's through the line of scrimmage only to have them run down after a 10 to 15 yd gain when we could of had a 40 or 50 yd gain or more with a big time back, I think from what I am seeing is gibb's is fixing the few thing's he felt were wrong the first time around, ala a back with serious speed and a real attack style defense, it's going to be interesting to see how thing's unfold early on we could be very scary, at least on offense.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.89329 seconds with 11 queries