Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


QB Poll

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Who should start week 8 against the Packers?
Ramsey 68 70.83%
Brunell 19 19.79%
Hasselbeck 9 9.38%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2004, 06:23 PM   #1
Bozzy
The Starter
 
Bozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 1,034
Jesus christ, Ramsey.

Yes, I said Jesus Christ or Ramsey...God is a great QB.
Bozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 10:37 PM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bozzy
Jesus christ, Ramsey.

Yes, I said Jesus Christ or Ramsey...God is a great QB.
The only play in our playbook would be the Hail Mary
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 05:58 AM   #3
Brute44
Camp Scrub
 
Brute44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 62
If Ramsey starts this game we LOSE. Gibbs knows it and the whole team knows it. As for the deflected interception that went 70 yards for a TD, I feel that this team has had some horrible luck with the whole turnover thing and that will continue until this team gets on a winning streak and confidence to boot. Brunell played well enough to win, yes he made some bad throws but hes hurt and HE IS NOT A ROLLOUT TYPE PASSER. I hope that coach sees this and make some changes with the scrambling /rollout play calls. The majority of Brunell's bad throws came off of rollouts. This has continued to be a pattern throughout the season. What worries me about this game is the fact that the defense, for the third week in a row continues to struggle against the run late in the game. I don't even know if I should say late in the game or the entire second half. I'm not criticizing them, they played there hearts out. Other that that, WE WON GUYS. Enjoy the next two weeks.
Brute44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 06:45 AM   #4
NY_Skinsfan
Impact Rookie
 
NY_Skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Age: 53
Posts: 838
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brute44
What worries me about this game is the fact that the defense, for the third week in a row continues to struggle against the run late in the game.
Did you ever think this may be due to the fact that the offense keeps starting the second half with 3 and outs. The defense is tired. If the offense can stay on the field a little longer the defense will have fresh legs.
NY_Skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 10:15 AM   #5
Brute44
Camp Scrub
 
Brute44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by NY_Skinsfan
Did you ever think this may be due to the fact that the offense keeps starting the second half with 3 and outs. The defense is tired. If the offense can stay on the field a little longer the defense will have fresh legs.
Gee, I never thought of that. I guess the Time Of Possion which was by the way, Redskins 34:01/Bears 25:59 shows that the Redskins had so many 3 and outs that they held the ball 8 minutes longer.
Brute44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 10:26 AM   #6
wbecker999
Camp Scrub
 
wbecker999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Age: 50
Posts: 93
Hassleback is a gamer, Ramsey is the sack king , Brunell sucks
wbecker999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 10:52 AM   #7
memphisskin
Impact Rookie
 
memphisskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Age: 54
Posts: 960
I vote for Brunell. I guess the guys who voted for Ramsey must be hoping that the Ramsey we'll get is not the guy who played against the Giants. I totally agree that Brunell is killing us, but so far when Ramsey got a chance this year he stunk even more than Brunell. I know he might be better than he showed in that game, but no one can say that out of what we've seen this year Ramsey is a better choice than Brunell. I guess maybe if you go by career stats in a Redskin jersey then Ramsey might be a better choice, but I don't think Brunell just suddenly forgot how to play football. I think the entire offense has been out of sync, 6 of 16 third down conversions against the Bears?

I saw all the overthrows, the out of bounds throws, the throws to no one in particular, and the tipped pass that was returned for a touchdown, and the miss on a wide open Coles. I saw it and thought "Brunell sucks" but if he won the job in an open competition in pre-season to switch now because we "think" someone else might be better means that we've become a lot more impatient under Snyder. Let Gibbs work out the kinks, and we all believe that he's going to do it. My guess is that the guys who are calling for Ramsey think that PR can turn the passing game around and lead us to the playoffs. But what has PR shown THIS YEAR to make anyone believe that?
memphisskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2004, 06:46 AM   #8
joecrisp
The Starter
 
joecrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brute44
If Ramsey starts this game we LOSE. Gibbs knows it and the whole team knows it.
Wow. That's a pretty speculative statement. If we're going to start making statements like that, why don't I just go the other way with it, and say that the only thing that kept Mark Brunell from LOSING this game was the defense. Gibbs knows it and the whole team knows it.

And I'd be willing to take it a step further and say that the only thing that's really keeping Mark Brunell in his starting role is a very large contract that is starting to look like a very large cinderblock chained to the collective foot of this team.

Joe Gibbs and the Redskins PR machine would like you to believe otherwise-- going so far as to throw the offensive line under the bus (despite producing a 200+ yard rushing day), and overlooking absolutely horrible passes while claiming the receivers just aren't open, deep or otherwise.

Anyone who's not wearing burgundy and gold glasses (or has otherwise taken them off temporarily to inspect the situation more clearly), bears witness to the fact that Mark Brunell is simply a very bad quarterback at this point in his career, and that his woeful performances are a direct cause of the offensive struggles, not vice-versa.
joecrisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.45086 seconds with 12 queries