Are we the Detroit Lions?

[skinsguy]

We need to up the anti-depressant medication I'm afraid. There is no comparison between the Lions and the Redskins. That is ridiculous.

[CrazyCanuck]

Gotta love the Warpath.

One thread compares us to the Lions, while another explains why we need to use our draft picks on receivers.

[Dirtbag59]

Die Troll Die!!!

[DynamiteRave]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

We need to up the anti-depressant medication I'm afraid. There is no comparison between the Lions and the Redskins. That is ridiculous.

Duhhhh. We aren't the Lions, we're the Dolphins! (No offense Finslady). We might as well just admit the fact that we are absolutely going to crash and burn next season even though we have decent players and potentially a decent staff. We might as well just quit the NFL and not play a game next season because there's obviously no way a team that made it to the playoffs this season, is going to make it next season, especially under a new HC, OC and DC. Forget that we came from being a shitty team to a playoff team in a matter of a few years. We have no continuity, which automatically means: We suck. Damn yous, Redskins organization! Damn yous!

(Note: This post is dripping with sarcasm)

[SKINSnCANES]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

We need to up the anti-depressant medication I'm afraid. There is no comparison between the Lions and the Redskins. That is ridiculous.

why because they drafted a lot of receivers? two of which were busts

"Since drafting Art Monk (first round, 1980) and Charlie Brown (eighth round, 1981), the Redskins have not had a great deal of success in drafting wide receivers. The rest of the 1980s included relative unknowns in Curtland Thomas and Eric Yarber. The 1990s included high-profile picks Desmond Howard and Michael Westbrook, neither of whom made a long-term impact. (Keenan McCardell was selected in the 12th round of the 1991 draft, but he played sparingly for the Redskins.) In recent years, Rod Gardner, Darnerien McCants and Taylor Jacobs were among selections at wide receiver. "

theres our track record on drafting receivers...

or because we had two years in the last five with winning records and they didnt.In 03 we were both 5-11, in 2004 we were both 6-10. In 2005 we were 10-6 while they were only 5-11. In 2006 we were killed them with a 5-11 record, they only had three wins...then this year we had two more wins after they fell apart with a 6-2 start.

But youre right, we have nothing in common. they have a horrible GM. We dotn have a GM so technically our GM has never made a bad signing. Though if you look at whatever the hell Vinnys title he, Im pretty sure hes signed a free agent or two that turned out to be overpayed and under performed.

we both rotate coachs as if you only get a one year contract (over the last ten years).

and sadly, they have had less starting qbs than us too...

Im not sayign we are the same team, but if everyone is going to just keep bashing peoples comments lets put some reasons behind it. There are plenty of reasons why we are different, try doing some research

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by SKINSnCANES

why because they drafted a lot of receivers? two of which were busts

"Since drafting Art Monk (first round, 1980) and Charlie Brown (eighth round, 1981), the Redskins have not had a great deal of success in drafting wide receivers. The rest of the 1980s included relative unknowns in Curtland Thomas and Eric Yarber. The 1990s included high-profile picks Desmond Howard and Michael Westbrook, neither of whom made a long-term impact. (Keenan McCardell was selected in the 12th round of the 1991 draft, but he played sparingly for the Redskins.) In recent years, Rod Gardner, Darnerien McCants and Taylor Jacobs were among selections at wide receiver. "

theres our track record on drafting receivers...

or because we had two years in the last five with winning records and they didnt.In 03 we were both 5-11, in 2004 we were both 6-10. In 2005 we were 10-6 while they were only 5-11. In 2006 we were killed them with a 5-11 record, they only had three wins...then this year we had two more wins after they fell apart with a 6-2 start.

But youre right, we have nothing in common. they have a horrible GM. We dotn have a GM so technically our GM has never made a bad signing. Though if you look at whatever the hell Vinnys title he, Im pretty sure hes signed a free agent or two that turned out to be overpayed and under performed.

we both rotate coachs as if you only get a one year contract (over the last ten years).

and sadly, they have had less starting qbs than us too...

Im not sayign we are the same team, but if everyone is going to just keep bashing peoples comments lets put some reasons behind it. There are plenty of reasons why we are different, try doing some research

Oh please, stop with all of that. If you feel fine comparing the Redskins to the Lions, by all means, go right ahead. However, I need not do any research because I am not comparing them to a franchise that has never been in the Super Bowl. It's all ridiculous and just shows that Redskins "fans" aren't happy unless they're whining about something.