Ocho Cinco In B&G

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by tryfuhl

what the bump

Well at least they didn't start a new useless/pointless thread. LOL.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Well at least they didn't start a new useless/pointless thread. LOL.

That probably would have been better...putting this thread out of its misery

[jsarno]

Those don't even look real. They look like those ink tats you have to apply water to first. Think about it, anyone that gets a tattoo knows that you scab up and it's darkest after you first get it...those look like they are about 10 years old with fading. Those are fakes.

[DBUCHANON101]

We have a good young group of wr's, leave it alone

[dall-assblows]

there fake anyway cause it says it. and plussss anyone who has gotten a tattoo knows they dont look like that right after, there SWOLLEN like hell right after and for the next week or two.

ocho addicted to attention cinco

[GTripp0012]

Man, when this thread was created Ochocinco was two words.

[SBXVII]

there fake anyway cause it says it. and plussss anyone who has gotten a tattoo knows they dont look like that right after, there SWOLLEN like hell right after and for the next week or two.

Oh, I'm betting they are fake. They had him on the NFL network showing off his latest training (boxing) and how it helps hand eye coordination. No tats. I even think he was on the show like last week or the beginning of this week and no tats. If they were new tats they would have the swollen look.

That would probaly mean we would only need to score like 8 more points a game. I could see CJ giving us that, hell i could see Malcom Kelly doing that

Well, like I said if we had one more WR worth their weight in gold to line up opposite Moss then perhaps some of the heat would be taken off Moss to score or Moss would take some of the heat off of someone else. Instead I think we will have 2 WR's worth their weight in gold in DT and MK. Then ARE can play the position he was meant to play. Who knows maybe one of the other Rookie WR's will step up also.

Damnit Man! Where'd you get that number!!! 50%? 50%?!!!

Ok, work with me here. CJ has had roughly 7 TD's a year. Last yr was a bad yr but I took his overall 53 TD's for the last 8 yrs he's played and got an average of 7 TD's per yr. Now Moss has been in the league for the same 8 yrs but only has 43 TD's overall. So I took the 43 TD's overall and divided by his 8 yrs and came up with 5 TD's per yr average. So in a nutshell 7 TD's and 5 TD's together is 12 TD's out of a 16 game season. In most of those games we lost we were like 3 points down so if we were able to pick up one more TD then naturally we would be winning by 4 points. I took the 4 points and divided it into the 16 game season and that would mean 4 extra games we would have won. Our season was 8-8, but if you add the 4 extra games won our season would have been 12-4, basically sweeping our division. So in essance he would have been 50% of our offense. Of course not including ARE, Portis, Betts, Cooley or Sellers.

Why are we even discussing this anymore?

Umm, good question. I simply thought the tatoo issue was funny. Instead of creating yet another waistful thread I put the tatoo issue under this thread with my creative genius mind spinning it like I was glad we didn't pick up CJ. Nifty huh?

Well at least they didn't start a new useless/pointless thread. LOL.

"I had a dog once....and his name was BINGO."

Plus I was getting tired of discussing the second and third string RB slots.
Seeing the "Landry is MIA" thread at the top of the board everyday.
....and Vick.

I'm just waiting for the "Who would you do" of cheerleaders. LOL

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Ok, work with me here. CJ has had roughly 7 TD's a year. Last yr was a bad yr but I took his overall 53 TD's for the last 8 yrs he's played and got an average of 7 TD's per yr. Now Moss has been in the league for the same 8 yrs but only has 43 TD's overall. So I took the 43 TD's overall and divided by his 8 yrs and came up with 5 TD's per yr average. So in a nutshell 7 TD's and 5 TD's together is 12 TD's out of a 16 game season. In most of those games we lost we were like 3 points down so if we were able to pick up one more TD then naturally we would be winning by 4 points. I took the 4 points and divided it into the 16 game season and that would mean 4 extra games we would have won. Our season was 8-8, but if you add the 4 extra games won our season would have been 12-4, basically sweeping our division. So in essance he would have been 50% of our offense. Of course not including ARE, Portis, Betts, Cooley or Sellers.

Eh. Way too many variables for that to be a valid argument. Chad put up those numbers on an offense without a TE like Cooley or the rushing attack a guy like Portis brings. Also, it's hard to dispute that a healthy Carson Palmer is a good bit better than Jason Campbell right now. Plus the offenses are so different on each team. And to compare Chad's stats to Moss' is tough to do because Santana never had a Houshmanzadeh caliber #2 to draw coverage. To say Chad's numbers on that Bengals team would directly translate into his production as a Redskin isn't a great argument IMO.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Eh. Way too many variables for that to be a valid argument. Chad put up those numbers on an offense without a TE like Cooley or the rushing attack a guy like Portis brings. Also, it's hard to dispute that a healthy Carson Palmer is a good bit better than Jason Campbell right now. Plus the offenses are so different on each team. And to compare Chad's stats to Moss' is tough to do because Santana never had a Houshmanzadeh caliber #2 to draw coverage. To say Chad's numbers on that Bengals team would directly translate into his production as a Redskin isn't a great argument IMO.

Holly Cow, I can't believe you took me seriously. LOL. You know the saying ....

"If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with BS."

LOL, it was all BS. lol.

[NM Redskin]

Lets see ... 50% of 8 wins is 4. 4+8 is 12. 12 wins with 85.