|
Re: Pete Prisco the idiot
he brings valid points to the arguement for the sake of "numbers". However, had Monk been elected when he should have been this wouldn't even have been a debate. Monk deserved to get in 7 years ago.
I usually dont bash writers on here, as they have these jobs because they are good at what they do, but where was this arguement when Irvin was elected prior to Monk?? no one really, outside of Redskin nation, really spoke up for Monk until the last year or so when all the Redskin reports and beat writers started making a stink about it.
|