Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Ocho Cinco In B&G

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you want to see Chad Johnson in a Redskins uniform?
Yes 155 55.16%
No 126 44.84%
Voters: 281. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-13-2008, 03:20 AM   #11
HOGTIMUS PRIME
Special Teams
 
HOGTIMUS PRIME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 101
Re: Ocho Cinco In B&G

Quote:
Originally Posted by irish View Post
I would prefer Moss but the problem with getting Moss is that the Skins are not enough of a consistent winner to keep him from starting to complain. CJ would also be good but like a previous post mentioned, he will not be happy when JC keeps missing him when he's open.

What I really wish is that the Skins could develop their own talent at cheaper prices rather than always overpaying for someone else's talent that just had a huge year.
That would require the ability to evaluate talent, which we do not have.

Just what we need another WR, how about O-linemen? Personally I think it's a joke to even consider bringing him in here. A self serving loudmouth is the last thing we need. Our WR's will be huge in this new system if Campbell can get them the ball, but if he can't find Moss or El, he ain't gonna find BIG TIME Chad Johnson either. Absolutely no reason to even be considering this move!
HOGTIMUS PRIME is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.19475 seconds with 12 queries