Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR... - Commanders Post at The Warpath

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR...

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR...

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

02-14-2008, 05:14 PM	#7
scafuri27 Special Teams Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Agawam, Massachusetts Posts: 132	Re: Jerry Porter? Better, cheaper, option at WR... Not buying it.. 6'2 220 pound WR with NFL expirience (8 years)??? How did that work out for the Bengals when they took Michael Westbrook (6'3 220 lbs) in 2002?.. Look at these stats after 8 years Porter--284 catches 3900 yards 30 tds Westbrook--285 catches 4300 yards 26 tds... Porter IMO wouldnt even be a band-aid at this point.. we should draft or try for #85. Porter=Westbrook... and that aint good! __________________ The 8th rule of fight club is..If this is your first night at FIGHT CLUB, you HAVE to fight.

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47 AM.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.