Falcons Extreme Makeover

[Dirtbag59]

i i think that that we should sign him for the vet min. i'm such a smart gm, i get grate players on the cheap.

I'm surprised Crumpler was the only good player on the offensive side of the ball, or at least the only one that I recall from the top of my head. I can't believe they did this all for a coordinator thats going to be there for a year or two. It's day like these where I'm glad DS is my owner.

[SkinsFanSince91]

Originally Posted by Dirtbag359

i i think that that we should sign him for the vet min. i'm such a smart gm, i get grate players on the cheap.

I'm surprised Crumpler was the only good player on the offensive side of the ball, or at least the only one that I recall from the top of my head. I can't believe they did this all for a coordinator thats going to be there for a year or two. It's day like these where I'm glad DS is my owner.

There is no way in Hades that a former all pro tight end will sign for the Vet minimum.

He would be great here, but some other team that needs tight end may sign him, like the Bengals, Seahawks, or Carolina.

[Dirtbag59]

Originally Posted by SkinsFanSince91

There is no way in Hades that a former all pro tight end will sign for the Vet minimum.

He would be great here, but some other team that needs tight end may sign him, like the Bengals, Seahawks, or Carolina.

Lol, read the first part again I was kidding during the start of that post. Then I transitioned to how I feel about the situation. I personally despise the Veteran Minimum suggestion due to the fact that it is one of the most over-suggested solutions to bringing in players over the age of 30.

The veteran minimum usually goes through when you have a player that

1. Your not sure about
2. Usually over the age to 35
3. Feels your a contender and/or would like a chance to play for their childhood team.
4. Has strong ties to your coach and qualifies for point 1.