![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: What should be the Redskins top priority for the 2008 draft? | |||
| Offensive line |
|
76 | 36.02% |
| Defensive line |
|
94 | 44.55% |
| Linebacker |
|
3 | 1.42% |
| Cornerback |
|
20 | 9.48% |
| Wide receiver |
|
15 | 7.11% |
| other |
|
3 | 1.42% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
As a general rule, its more of a guideline that I use, but who the hell am I? Of course there is always an excecption to the rule, however there is not a prospect close to that in this years draft. Braylon Edwads was the last 1st round reciever to actually impress me enough to consider breaking my rule for. Before that I cannot remember.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Calvin Johnson?
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
True, but i have to disagree. I think johnson is an absolute phreak (with a ph) and is gonna eventually assert his will on the NFL when he gets a few years under his belt
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Larry Fitzgerald had 750 yards his first year. Johnson had 700+ yards himself last year. If he didn't have to share the rock so much then his numbers would have been better. Just because he didn't have 1,000 yards last year doesn't mean he's a bust. In fact he's poised for a breakout year, assuming he stays healthy, in part because the OC wants to make him a big part of the offence.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
FOOTBALL OUTSIDERS: Football analysis and NFL stats for the Moneyball era - Authors of Pro Football Prospectus 2008 Twenty-one years ago this week, Bill Walsh stood before the skeptical Bay Area media and defended a controversial decision. He told them that the 49ers’ troubled rookie wide receiver would remain a starter despite several bad performances. The rookie’s name was Jerry Rice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 41
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|