Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Chad Johnson up to his old antics...

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-27-2008, 12:17 PM   #25
SBXVII
Franchise Player
 
SBXVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
Re: Chad Johnson up to his old antics...

This is funny. Everyone is argueing/discussing their point like all of a sudden everyone will agree their oppinion. LOL. Everyone has good points but I doubt we will have any effect on what the Skins do. Would I like to have CJ, yes because we need a tall proven WR and he is that. However could he be a locker room problem, yes. I guess it's a chance some people are willing to take and some aren't.

On Extreme skins someone posted us looking at a RB draft prospect. My first thought was to see what the Bengals needed to see if there was possibly a gentlemans agreement in regards to drafting a RB for them in exchange for CJ. Wouldn't you know it they drafted a RB last yr that tore his ACL last yr and did not play. I wonder if they are worried he will not be back in 100% and are thinking trade. Maybe CJ pays back some of his money like Lavar did and that helps the Bengals eat some of that 8 mill they will lose and get two 1st rounds this yr. Possibly a DE and a RB from us either one we already have or drafting one for them.
SBXVII is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.51768 seconds with 11 queries