Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Source: Dallas Cowboys discuss deal for Pacman Jones

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-30-2008, 10:58 PM   #1
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
Re: Source: Dallas Cowboys discuss deal for Pacman Jones

Quote:
Originally Posted by sandtrapjack View Post
Garrett was the only staff member in place. Whereas DS hired more than that. It is no secret that the only reason Zorn got the job was because no one else wanted it. All the candidates that were spoken to walked away, and the only thing left at the table was Zorn.
Whereas DS hired more than that..? So what, what does that exactly mean to you then?

And you are 100% WRONG on the coaching candidates (unless you have some NFL insider secret if so prove it), if not get your facts at least close. Remember Fassel, Mooch & Meeks where all waiting to get the word on the coaching gig.

The Redskins happened to hire what they think is the right man for the job, plain and simple!
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 11:08 PM   #2
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Source: Dallas Cowboys discuss deal for Pacman Jones

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn View Post
Whereas DS hired more than that..? So what, what does that exactly mean to you then?

And you are 100% WRONG on the coaching candidates (unless you have some NFL insider secret if so prove it), if not get your facts at least close. Remember Fassel, Mooch & Meeks where all waiting to get the word on the coaching gig.

The Redskins happened to hire what they think is the right man for the job, plain and simple!
It's probably best to ignore him. I made the mistake of replying as well. Just remember that first and foremost he's a Cowboys fan on a Redskins fan site. So while he, for the most part (unlike some of his fellow Cowboys fans) is not a bad member just be sure to take everything he says with a grain of salt.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2008, 07:27 AM   #3
skinsfan_nn
Playmaker
 
skinsfan_nn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
Re: Source: Dallas Cowboys discuss deal for Pacman Jones

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
It's probably best to ignore him. I made the mistake of replying as well. Just remember that first and foremost he's a Cowboys fan on a Redskins fan site. So while he, for the most part (unlike some of his fellow Cowboys fans) is not a bad member just be sure to take everything he says with a grain of salt.
Good point SS. He is a cowgirl fan on a Redskin fan forum with no logic behind his post. That kind of speaks for itself, just a little confused.

So are the cowgirls, they just realized right now they are the only team that have interest in this retard.

ESPN - Source: Pacman talks between Cowboys, Titans stall - NFL
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68

THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE!
skinsfan_nn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.95574 seconds with 11 queries