![]() |
|
|||||||
| Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc. |
| View Poll Results: Which Candidate Has the Best Energy Policy? | |||
| Candidate #1 (Clinton) |
|
3 | 16.67% |
| Candidate #2 (McCain) |
|
8 | 44.44% |
| Candidate #3 (Obama) |
|
7 | 38.89% |
| Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Understanding the Issues 2008: Energy
I don't think people adequately understand the paucity of oil that remains in this world. If you are familiar with peak oil theory (which isn't so much a theory as a geoligical fact) then you know oil will reach a peak point of production after which the quality of oil will be reduced and it will be increasingly more difficult to extract. Increasing oil consumption in the developing world, particularily in China but really everywhere, is only quickening this inevitability. Now some argue that oil production peaked last year, but when it peaks is really irrelevant. What matters is that it will.
That means that at some point we are going to face a major day of reckoning, since not only transportation but the world's entire industrial infrastructure is predicated on access to relatively cheap oil. My point is that a major technological project is needed to avert what will likely be an extremely unstable period, as the world's 3 powers - Europe, America, China, and their respective allies - fight over the remaining scraps. I think all 3 candidates fall short in doing enough on this and I wish someone would speak to the people honestly about the poisonous effect that increased consumption in a world of declining oil production will have on the stability of the global economic system. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Understanding the Issues 2008: Energy
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Understanding the Issues 2008: Energy
Yeah I agree and that's what is likely to happen. The problem is that we will have a painful adjustment period while we try to figure things out. And I don't mean painful as in having to eat out less, I mean major global instability. That's the worst case scenario, but I don't think an implausible one. It's not as if countries have never gone to war over oil before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Understanding the Issues 2008: Energy
Quote:
Not that I'm arguing w/ you, cause I don't really know the science, but I suspect that environmental damage will become critical before oil supply becomes critical.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,836
|
Re: Understanding the Issues 2008: Energy
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Understanding the Issues 2008: Energy
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|