Do we overvalue the draft?

[Skinny Tee]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

That makes no sense at all to me. So you're saying, for example, keeping all nine picks and using the first one on Malcolm Kelly is more effective than keeping eight out of nine and trading the first one (and maybe a 3rd next year) for Chad Johnson simply because we're keeping all our picks?

Who said anything about drafting Kelly. Personally I don't mind another year with our receivers as is. Sure they're not the best but there if there are no UFA available or prospects in the draft then don't force one with such a high pick.

Address it next year and select someone at the many other positions of need. I rather devote a large amount of money to multiple homegrown Redskin players than just to one imported commodity. (The large amount of money being the 20 million+ guaranteed that would consist of CJ's new proposed contract)

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

Who said anything about drafting Kelly. Personally I don't mind another year with our receivers as is. Sure they're not the best but there if there are no UFA available or prospects in the draft then don't force one with such a high pick.

Address it next year and select someone at the many other positions of need. I rather devote a large amount of money to multiple homegrown Redskin players than just to one imported commodity. (The large amount of money being the 20 million+ that would consist of CJ's new proposed contract)

The point is the Redskins have shown serious interest in drafting Kelly.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

The point is the Redskins have shown serious interest in drafting Kelly.

Is this a bad thing??

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Is this a bad thing??

No.

Forget it.