![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: WTF Pick of Day One | |||
| WR Devin Thomas (34) |
|
18 | 12.00% |
| TE Fred Davis (48) |
|
95 | 63.33% |
| WR Malcolm Kelly (51) |
|
37 | 24.67% |
| Voters: 150. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 3,007
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
This Fred Davis dude couldn't have been the best value pick, check out some draft sites...he's ranked anywhere from 51-74....we picked him 48....and there were other guys available ranked a lot higher....I am really scratching my head why we did not go value OR need with that one.
Of course I hope they know something about Fred Davis that no one else seems to know. They sure did their research with Cooley...and that worked out pretty well. Maybe our staff knows how to find great TEs.....I hope.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
You did WHAT?!?
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 37
Posts: 14,189
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
one guy did i forgot who
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
how well you think we'll get graded for these picks (not that it means anything)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
We benefitted because they dropped so much. The true grade is our record next year.
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 241
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
I'm thinking we'll see ARE traded for Jason Taylor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,063
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
That would be sick....but its highly unlikely
__________________
I hate Dallas...Period |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,525
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
LOL. I was actually about to say what if we sent our 4th for JT. I like your option much better though
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
How about a none option to the poll?
The more I think about it the more I like what we came away with when you're talking about value for where we picked these guys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Quote:
![]() Yeah, go ahead and add that if you want. I wanted to limit the options so people chose either one of the options or just wait for the next poll
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
Use post # 739 for the "none" option
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 241
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
I'm just saying, I never saw what happened today coming. So who knows whats next. I guess trading ARE would take a large hit on the cap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Mr. Brightside
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 4,453
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
vinny and zorn said they picked by their board, the best available. they said they will continue to do that in the following rounds, however they dont think it will be another receiver. zorn also mentioned durability problems with receivers as another reason we took them. he said the davis pick was that obviously he was the best on their board, and it was important in the WCO to be able to change personnel to keep the defenses on their heels more or less. davis will help us be more versatile, and he also mentioned him helping in short yardage
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
|
Re: The official 2008 draft discussion thread
On the offensive line, you have to figure Jon Jansen will be in the mix this season. Like it or not, that's how it's going down. I would also have to think Stephon Heyer, only a second year player, will be better on some mechanics, strength, and maybe add some bulk. Even if he's marginally better, and no on this board would argue that kid more than held his own last year, he's a very solid back up.
Chris Samuels - Let's face it, no one is going to beat him out anytime soon. He's going to play until the wheels fall off. So I don't care how good your left tackle is coming out of the draft, that's just not a position we're looking to make any immediate changes. Casey Rabach - Again, a very solid player that is possibly the glue to the entire offensive line. He's, and I say only 30 years old right now, and has a lot of years left at that position. Randy Thomas - What else do we need to say here. Our best all around offensive lineman. Peter Kendall - Here's a position where the Skins maybe looking to replace a starter, but this year isn't that year. So from I can see, at best the Skins need to add some depth here and not look for any immediate starters or impact players. You never want to say never, but I just can't imagine the offensive line getting crippled with injuries the way they did last year. No way, no how. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|