![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The Offensive Line: Let's Review
Youngest starting lineman you mean
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: The Offensive Line: Let's Review
Yeah. I'm just worried about making wholesale changes to the line in the span of a year or two. Supposedly "chemistry" means more to O-linemen than any other unit. I'd prefer to jettison about 1 starting o-lineman per year than 2 or so in 2009 and another 2 or so in 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: The Offensive Line: Let's Review
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: The Offensive Line: Let's Review
Agreed. Chemistry doesn't necessarily have to be amongst just the starters at all times. As long as Buges keeps the whole group united and tough, and the guys get along in the locker room, chemistry won't be a problem. As far as I'm concerned, chemistry hasn't been any bit of an issue since Spurrier left. I would argue that we have one of the best, if not THE best locker room in football. Especially with that 21 jersey hanging strong.
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|