![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
He also led the league with 20 ints in the regular season, and had a mildly unimpressive 6.3 yards per attempt to go with a totally unimpressive 56.1% completion. Those numbers border on Grossman/Tavaris Jackson/Brodie Croyle levels.
I tend to think that there is something sustainable about his maturation in the playoffs, something real about it, but is it possible he was playing a little over his head throwing only one int in the playoffs, considering he threw about 1.25 per game in the regular season last year?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
|
#62 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
Pats thought the same thing,how did that work out for them? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
Yup............and that brings me back to Shockey how is a bad rout runner and is soley reponsible for Eli's Viking game.He drops a ball and then gets in Eli's face...he's a fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Oh, you mean the pass where the Pats had like three guys on Eli and some how he brook free and then rolled out and made that throw. OK it was all luck. Not luck. Eli has had his ups and downs and when he got to the playoffs showed he really could lead the Giants which he did. Now will he build on this or fall back to an average QB? Right now as SB Champs I cannot say he was just lucky with the playes he had to make. They did beat a team that had won 18 in a row and one that stomped us into the ground.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
I can't wait to see how this plays out once training camp begins! :headbange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
Ahhhh no,Look I think I've been pretty realistic in my evaluations of Eli and the Giants but to answer you....the Bucs at their place,the Cowgirls at their place and Greenbay at 10 below and at their place! 11 games won away from home on the road 3 or 4 maybe luck 11 no.Toomer stepped up ,Steve Smith step up so did Tyree and Boss ,no Shockey in sight.If you beleive the Giants can't win without him I have a DVD from2/3/08 if you want to watch it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Is that a serious question?! David Tyree is the guy who made the ridiculous catch in the Super Bowl with Rodney Harrison draped all over him and Kevin Boss is the backup to Shockey who came up pretty big in the playoffs and showed flashes all year. Are you kidding me? "Who are Tyree and Boss?" Do you watch anything other than Redskins football?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 362
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
I'm not disagreeing that Tyree isn't that good, he might not even make the team, I was just letting you know who he was. As for Boss, while he's no Shockey, he can block and he's relatively effective in the passing game. I'd take him over an overrated headache any day of the week. I can't stand anything about Jeremy Shockey, I do respect that he plays hard, but the guy's and asshole who's game still isn't where most people wanted to be when he was coming out of college. He basically peaked in his rookie year.
For me, Jeremy Shockey is way more trouble than he's worth. If he were somehow a positive influence on his team he'd be a great player, but he's not worth keeping because he can't keep his mouth shut. |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Just stop dude. Talking trash to the Super Bowl Champs is pretty pointless. At the end of the day they still have the rings so that's all that really matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Saints After Shockey?!
Quote:
I mean, I like the guy and all, and was happy for him that his team won a SB, and he played phenomenal in the playoffs and all, but you are right, he's still Eli Manning. Eli isn't somehow a different player now that he has a super bowl victory. He's the same Eli Manning. Perhaps a bit closer to his prime now than he was a year ago, but I still feel like he's capable of holding the Giants back in the future.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|