![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: The Redskins were the toughest 'D' that Adrian Peterson faced in 2007
Wow, that makes me feel good about our defense. The question is though why he didn't say San Fran? They held him to 3 yards rushing on 14 carries (0.3 ypc) while we held him to 27 yards on 9 carries (3.0 ypc).
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: The Redskins were the toughest 'D' that Adrian Peterson faced in 2007
Well it said toughest which could also enclude hardest hitting. Maybe after he played us the next morning he was hurting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: The Redskins were the toughest 'D' that Adrian Peterson faced in 2007
Quote:
![]() scrolled thru some of the comments, man that packers vikings rivalry is heated. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: The Redskins were the toughest 'D' that Adrian Peterson faced in 2007
The reason he didn't say San Fran was b/c the Vikes won that game (27-7) and lost to us (32-21). Also we held them as a team to 87 yards rushing whereas SF let Taylor run all over them and the team netted 130 yards. They probably just called taylor's number more cuz he was the better back for that game. Finally, our game against the Vikes had playoff implications and Peterson was probably amped to perform. So he failed on a bigger stage which definitely sticks with a player longer. Overall, SF was garbage too so it didn't matter that they stacked the box.
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|