![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor? | |||
| Yes |
|
195 | 91.98% |
| No |
|
17 | 8.02% |
| Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Not going to happen. I'd be happy with a 5 sack improvement on the 33 figure from last year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
That would make this trade a colossal bust if we improved by only 5 sacks.. You'd be happy with that?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
A 5 sack increase is significant over last year. 7-8 sacks would be even better, and the more sacks they get, the happier I am. Remember that older units trend downwards in terms of production, so the Redskins had to improve their pass rush just to stay at 33 sacks. I think Taylor is good enough to get us to 38-40, but 50 sacks is a pipe dream. Taylor himself should get about ten sacks, but some those sacks are going to be taken from Carter, Washington, and Rocky. Only Rocky is a good bet to match his sack production from last year (3). If anything, the addition of Taylor means that Washington will be asked to come less often on the pass rush. He won't line up as a down lineman on passing downs anymore.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right! We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible. But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|