Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do you approve of the trade for Jason Taylor?
Yes 195 91.98%
No 17 8.02%
Voters: 212. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2008, 01:09 AM   #1
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsarno View Post
FYI- John Clayton reported on NFL live that he thinks we have a good shot at 50 sacks this season with Taylor on the line. That's great news considering we had 33 last year...and I don't recall the last time we had 50.
I like John Clayton a lot, I really do, but when I read this, I instantly thought of Steve Phillips prediction the '08 Detroit Tigers would score 1000 runs this year.

Not going to happen. I'd be happy with a 5 sack improvement on the 33 figure from last year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:54 AM   #2
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I like John Clayton a lot, I really do, but when I read this, I instantly thought of Steve Phillips prediction the '08 Detroit Tigers would score 1000 runs this year.

Not going to happen. I'd be happy with a 5 sack improvement on the 33 figure from last year.
That would make this trade a colossal bust if we improved by only 5 sacks.. You'd be happy with that?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 09:39 AM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
That would make this trade a colossal bust if we improved by only 5 sacks.. You'd be happy with that?
Not happy, happy, but you know what I mean. Satisfied.

A 5 sack increase is significant over last year. 7-8 sacks would be even better, and the more sacks they get, the happier I am.

Remember that older units trend downwards in terms of production, so the Redskins had to improve their pass rush just to stay at 33 sacks. I think Taylor is good enough to get us to 38-40, but 50 sacks is a pipe dream.

Taylor himself should get about ten sacks, but some those sacks are going to be taken from Carter, Washington, and Rocky. Only Rocky is a good bet to match his sack production from last year (3). If anything, the addition of Taylor means that Washington will be asked to come less often on the pass rush. He won't line up as a down lineman on passing downs anymore.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2009, 10:55 PM   #4
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
That would make this trade a colossal bust if we improved by only 5 sacks.. You'd be happy with that?
Bumping this thread.

Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right!

We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible.

But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 09:28 AM   #5
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 12,514
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Bumping this thread.

Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right!

We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible.

But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
mmmmm hindsight
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2009, 12:59 PM   #6
SC Skins Fan
The Starter
 
SC Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Bumping this thread.

Clayton said we could get 50 sacks. We got 25 sacks. Hey, he was half-right!

We got 8 fewer sacks than last year. I believe a schematic change is primarily responsible.

But reading through this thread, it seems somewhat insincere that people would bitch about not having a 2nd rounder this year. We got a pro-bowler didn't you hear?
Sweet vindication for you.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do.
SC Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:59 PM   #7
jsarno
Franchise Player
 
jsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 31 Spooner St.
Age: 51
Posts: 9,534
Re: Redskins trade for Jason Taylor (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I like John Clayton a lot, I really do, but when I read this, I instantly thought of Steve Phillips prediction the '08 Detroit Tigers would score 1000 runs this year.
I thought that was a bit overzealous as well. They are on pace for 806 runs this year. However, Phillips tends to use emotion with his predictions while Clayton is more level headed. Clayton is right A LOT. While he didn't guarentee a 50 sack season, he did say we could be close. To me, 45 is close, and 48 would be amazing!

Quote:
Not going to happen. I'd be happy with a 5 sack improvement on the 33 figure from last year.
I do not think a 5 sack improvement would be something I'd be happy with. We need more than that. We have complained about our pass rush for a while, and while 33 was an improvement last year, it was not what we were looking for. Let us not forget that Taylor outsacked Carter last year. With those two together, they should create A LOT of disruption.
__________________
Zoltan is ZESTY! - courtesy of joeredskin
jsarno is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.44361 seconds with 12 queries