![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 458
|
Re: Gameday Thread Jets- Skins
Quote:
For me, It would be a QB rating of 85+ for this year, and 95+ next year. Pre-season doesn't count. J-Dawg.
__________________
Theismann: You're wrong, the rule is wrong, the refs are wrong, and I'm right |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Gameday Thread Jets- Skins
Quote:
Your expectations for 2009 are astronomical. Only 6 QBs had a QB rating of 95+ in 2007. I'm not prepared to say, "If JC isn't a top 5 QB in 2009, I say we junk him." To say otherwise would mean that you believe that guys like Matt Hasselbeck, Donovan McNabb, Drew Brees, Carson Palmer, Jay Cutler, Matt Schaub, and Jeff Garcia (none of whom had a rating of 95+ in 2007) don't make the cut. Last edited by Sheriff Gonna Getcha; 08-18-2008 at 05:30 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 458
|
Re: Gameday Thread Jets- Skins
Quote:
My point is, that he had virtually unchanged qb ratings for the partial 2006 year, and the longer 2007 season. He needs to improve, and improve with each of the next two years. The whole idea of a learning curve is that as with experience, one gets better, increasing productivity. That's what I'm looking for in any player early in his career, but espcially the QB. J-Dawg.
__________________
Theismann: You're wrong, the rule is wrong, the refs are wrong, and I'm right |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|