Why did we keep Tryon?

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by JLee9718

I would rather have kept Matteral Richardson than Tryon.

Actually JLee, we kept them both. Fact is that the chances another team would take Tryon is probably a lot higher than someone taking Richardson(obviously no one else took Richardson so even a 1% chance of someone taking Tryon is higher) and then we WOULD have only had one choice. As it is now, we can develop both, and see who can compete in the future.

[JoeRedskin]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Actually JLee, we kept them both. Fact is that the chances another team would take Tryon is probably a lot higher than someone taking Richardson(obviously no one else took Richardson so even a 1% chance of someone taking Tryon is higher) and then we WOULD have only had one choice. As it is now, we can develop both, and see who can compete in the future.

Brilliant, absolutely brilliant observation. You must come from a very very smart family.