JC is not what I thought.

[doughtydoubter]

i said it before...he needs to stop coaching the qbs and start coaching a team

[MTK]

Originally Posted by doughtydoubter

i said it before...he needs to stop coaching the qbs and start coaching a team

With the way JC looked he might want to spend MORE time with him.

[Twilbert07]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

With the way JC looked he might want to spend MORE time with him.

Or with Colt Brennan! Just kidding of course. But I think we'll find out over the next month that JC is not the QB of the future. I know it will suck, but that's my gut feeling. He took several steps backward after only being OK last year before his injuiry.

[doughtydoubter]

Hey just because i dont like doughty doesnt mean i can support other people. my name on here used to be uhohjimoh

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by doughtydoubter

Hey just because i dont like doughty doesnt mean i can support other people. my name on here used to be uhohjimoh

Why did you change it? Better said, why did you add a second account?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by doughtydoubter

Hey just because i dont like doughty doesnt mean i can support other people. my name on here used to be uhohjimoh

Why did you create a new account? Just to change your name? I guess you haven't read the site guidelines because that's an offense that can get you booted.

[pdid5000]

JC is our new PR (patrick ramsey). "give him a chance", "he's young", "give him another year". I want JC to succeed just as much as everyone else but i don't see it happening just like ramsey.

[GhettoDogAllStars]

Both lines sucked. Period.

Rhythm is invaluable for a QB and an offense. We couldn't pass protect for shit, and as a result we never got into a rhythm.

As for defense, our line was owned by the Giants. On top of that, we couldn't tackle that son of a bitch Jacobs -- dude's way too big and heavy for our small defense.

[freddyg12]

I tried to read all of these posts but have to much work to do, so forgive me if I repeat something from another post.

Mike Wise's article in today's wash post really puts JC's dilema in perspective. He's in his 4th year & at a time when he's expected to realize his potential & have that 'break out year.' On the other hand, he's not only in a new system again, he's got a rookie head coach that has never called plays in the nfl before.

I understand people that say he's paid to perfom no matter what. That's true, but it doesn't make it any easier for him to have so many changes. My view of it is, why put it all on JC, the O looked bad in several respects other than some solid running plays.

Last night's problems unfortunately look to go well beyond JC.

[doughtydoubter]

it was forever ago and i couldnt remember my password and any email i had it on was loooong gone it was over 4years ago.

[SmootSmack]

I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB

[Jamaican'Skin]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB

Well just so you know, I have Colt Brennan as my starting QB and he got 25.0675 pts by just sitting on the bench

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB

This is how normal leagues would calculate it:
Manning 216 yards = 10 pts. 1 td = 6 pts. 1 int = -2 pts. Total = 14 points.
Campbell 133 yards = 6 pts. 1 td = 6 pts. Total = 12 points.

I do get your point...just wanted to point that out.

I was not impressed with Manning's performace overall. He looked VERY good in the first half, but looked terrible in the 2nd.

[irish]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think the numbers speak for themselves. Campbell got me 8.66 Yahoo fantasy points. Whereas Manning only had 8.27 points. So clearly Campbell is the better QB

That's an interesting stat. Eli didnt look too good in the 2nd half and I bet most of JC's points came at the end of the game when the Giants were in prevent. Looking at this game a day later, for as bad as the Skins got crushed in the 1st half they were still in the game. If they had been able to score 20 points they could have won this game. The Giants played a good game but not great. It reminded me of the game last year when the Skins were trouncing the Giants and it looked like TC was going to get the axe but the Giants found a way to come back and win and ultimately revive their season. For as bad as this game looked it was a game the Skins could have won.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by irish

That's an interesting stat. Eli didnt look too good in the 2nd half and I bet most of JC's points came at the end of the game when the Giants were in prevent. Looking at this game a day later, for as bad as the Skins got crushed in the 1st half they were still in the game. If they had been able to score 20 points they could have won this game. The Giants played a good game but not great. It reminded me of the game last year when the Skins were trouncing the Giants and it looked like TC was going to get the axe but the Giants found a way to come back and win and ultimately revive their season. For as bad as this game looked it was a game the Skins could have won.

And you bring a good point. They could have won!
The G's are a pretty good scoring team. They obviously scored 16 points. Our D managed to get it together to give up FG's rather than TD's. You keep NFL teams to 16 each week, you are in position to win EVERY game.
BUT, you gotta' have a little O. J.C. and company will have to do their part.