![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
Portis, Fletcher, Brooks.
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
None of them were great.
Portis had an awesome block on one of their DEs, and also a per carry average of below 4. If you're going to say the line wasn't blocking, then that also has to carry over to JC's performance. Not great. Fletcher was all over the field as usual, but I saw a couple of missed tackles and a few times where he was overmatched. Nothing great from him tonight. The only great thing Brooks was involved in tonight was when Jerome McDougal ran into him. He was rather unspectacular otherwise. Short(ish) punts, and no boomers. Good hangtimes, though. Not great.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 There's much more to it than the play of your QB. JC didn't look great tonight, but name me someone who did who wasn't returning kicks. JC gets a pass in my book until it becomes obvious that he is the weakest link. Portis, Fletcher, Brooks. Burress, Jacobs, Tuck...... Last edited by SBXVII; 09-05-2008 at 12:09 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|