![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
It's naive to think that JC's problem is a lack of intelligence.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
So, with JC out from behind center, this team is a Super Bowl contender?
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
Quote:
Its not all JC's fault. He has an old slow o line that doesnt give him the time he needs. He also has midget receivers and that makes it tough. JC is just one part of a fundamentally flawed team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
Quote:
If there is a fundamentally flawed unit on the team, it's the offensive line. They weren't good in pass pro last season and probably won't be any better this season. But Campbell is a ticking time bomb waiting to explode onto the scene, and the defense is almost as good as it was last year.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
All the more reason to know the offense and get rid of the ball. The first play of the damn game should've been an incomplete pass out of bounds. Chuck it, don't hold it for a sack.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
That was 100% on Campbell, but if we are going to note that, we should point out that the pass rushing demons on the DL did not sack Campbell the rest of the game, which shows that JC improved, because the pass blocking did struggle all night.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
New poster here, just stumbled on a link to this forum. If you give up on JC now, you might as well cut him. Holding the ball too long, POOR clock management, etc, etc. It's going to take more than one game for me to put him on the bench. Bring in Colt? There goes the season.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,048
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
I could be wrong but I think JC was inside the tackle box on that play so he couldn't have thrown it away without getting a penalty.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
|
Re: JC is not what I thought.
Quote:
I give him until game 5 for Zorn to make the call to bench him (if he continues to do poorly). |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|