Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


JC is not what I thought.

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2008, 12:32 AM   #1
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Let me get this straight. I argue that JC is not capable and you say that(directed to me) Matty might have to step in after that in general why don't you watch another team? I was a JC fan all along so when I get mad about his development this year you come up with this?
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:33 AM   #2
Redskin Warrior
The Starter
 
Redskin Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 1,544
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Let me get this straight. I argue that JC is not capable and you say that(directed to me) Matty might have to step in after that in general why don't you watch another team? I was a JC fan all along so when I get mad about his development this year you come up with this?
You don't sound like a JC fan
__________________
WIN, LOSE OR DRAW I'M A DIE-HARD REDSKIN FAN!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
First they ban winning...now this?
Redskin Warrior is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:38 AM   #3
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
You don't sound like a JC fan
He was bad very bad tonight. I realize that he will go through growing pains, but that was hard to watch. I sure as hell hope I am wrong. Like I said I have been a big JC supporter.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:02 AM   #4
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,610
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
He was bad very bad tonight. I realize that he will go through growing pains, but that was hard to watch. I sure as hell hope I am wrong. Like I said I have been a big JC supporter.
What in the hell were you expecting our offense to do against the Giants defense? Were you expecting a young Qb in his 3rd NFL offense in his 4th year to go off against the SB champs?? I honestly was expecting this.
skinsfan69 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:38 AM   #5
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin Warrior View Post
You don't sound like a JC fan
He sounds like a disgruntled JC fan.

It's kinda like how when you find out how Santa isn't real anymore. You keep hoping and wishing and then one day you're like... "Well damn."

__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:44 AM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Let me get this straight. I argue that JC is not capable and you say that(directed to me) Matty might have to step in after that in general why don't you watch another team? I was a JC fan all along so when I get mad about his development this year you come up with this?
Okay. It looks like I've offended you somewhat. I'd like to just say I'm sorry and be done with it, but that would be partially insincere. The goal was to get you to think rationally (I'm under the impression that you are PUI -- posting under the influence, correct me if I'm wrong), because even though we disagree a lot, you are usually way more rational then this.

I think I've accomplished my goal to get you to be more rational. So now, I'm sorry if I offended you.

I can sympathize with your frustration with the offense, but I think you'd be best served to spread the blame/frusteration around and not act like Campbell's development curve is totally destroyed. This is a speed bump, not the Great Wall.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 12:55 AM   #7
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Okay. It looks like I've offended you somewhat. I'd like to just say I'm sorry and be done with it, but that would be partially insincere. The goal was to get you to think rationally (I'm under the impression that you are PUI -- posting under the influence, correct me if I'm wrong), because even though we disagree a lot, you are usually way more rational then this.

I think I've accomplished my goal to get you to be more rational. So now, I'm sorry if I offended you.

I can sympathize with your frustration with the offense, but I think you'd be best served to spread the blame/frusteration around and not act like Campbell's development curve is totally destroyed. This is a speed bump, not the Great Wall.
Now I'm rational. Thank you. After we argued for so long on Brady vs Manning over two seasons did I meet your goal of being rational? You are right about one thing. I am frustrated.
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:02 AM   #8
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
Now I'm rational. Thank you. After we argued for so long on Brady vs Manning over two seasons did I meet your goal of being rational? You are right about one thing. I am frustrated.
Like I said before, I thought you were wrong on Manning/Brady. I didn't think you were irrational.

I don't blame you for being frustrated.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:07 AM   #9
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Like I said before, I thought you were wrong on Manning/Brady. I didn't think you were irrational.

I don't blame you for being frustrated.
I was right on Brady/Manning GTrIpp. Maybe this thread was a little rash?
wilsowilso is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:13 AM   #10
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilsowilso View Post
I was right on Brady/Manning GTrIpp. Maybe this thread was a little rash?
No, and yes.

Brady-Manning is water under the bridge though, at least for now. People will defend Brady's "clutchiness" to the point of insanity, and it doesn't make any sense to me, but I'm willing to let it go for now -- ultimately it's a matter of opinion no matter how convincing the evidence is on one side or the other...there's always another argument. Plus I'm not 100% convinced that Manning is better. More like, 98.5%
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline  
Old 09-05-2008, 01:19 AM   #11
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 52
Posts: 2,841
Re: JC is not what I thought.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
No, and yes.

Brady-Manning is water under the bridge though, at least for now. People will defend Brady's "clutchiness" to the point of insanity, and it doesn't make any sense to me, but I'm willing to let it go for now -- ultimately it's a matter of opinion no matter how convincing the evidence is on one side or the other...there's always another argument. Plus I'm not 100% convinced that Manning is better. More like, 98.5%
You got three rings and the best season by an NFL QB ever to deal with Mr Numbers. Don't tell me you picked Brady for your fantasy team GTripp?
wilsowilso is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.39660 seconds with 11 queries