Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Jason Campbell: not too shabby, eh?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2008, 05:15 PM   #1
GusFrerotte
Registered User
 
GusFrerotte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
Re: Jason Campbell: not too shabby, eh?

Yeah the WCO is shorter, quicker passing routes that helps open up the running attack. That being said I wish our running game was a bit better. Portis might not hit 1000 yards at the rate he is going. That being said do you guys think I should play JC or the Buffalo QB this Sunday for fantasy?
GusFrerotte is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 05:39 PM   #2
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
Re: Jason Campbell: not too shabby, eh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Yeah the WCO is shorter, quicker passing routes that helps open up the running attack. That being said I wish our running game was a bit better. Portis might not hit 1000 yards at the rate he is going. That being said do you guys think I should play JC or the Buffalo QB this Sunday for fantasy?

I agree. Im concerned about the running game myself. I don't get why they decided to keep gibbs's running game. I thought the WCO implored it's own running game, much of it out of spread formations.
__________________
I am the brute squad.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 08:30 PM   #3
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
Re: Jason Campbell: not too shabby, eh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GusFrerotte View Post
Yeah the WCO is shorter, quicker passing routes that helps open up the running attack. That being said I wish our running game was a bit better. Portis might not hit 1000 yards at the rate he is going. That being said do you guys think I should play JC or the Buffalo QB this Sunday for fantasy?
Actually, Portis is right on schedule for 1,200+ yards (he has 248 through 3 games). If he stays healthy, he's a shoo-in for 1,000 yards.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2008, 08:49 PM   #4
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: Jason Campbell: not too shabby, eh?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
Actually, Portis is right on schedule for 1,200+ yards (he has 248 through 3 games). If he stays healthy, he's a shoo-in for 1,000 yards.
Actually he's on pace for 1,323 yards.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.41540 seconds with 11 queries