![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
How about Kelly's analysis.....
Negatives: Lacks the short steps and quick feet, but does get good depth in his route progression with his long stride...Perhaps a product of the team's reliance on its ground game, he will disappear for long stretches ...A good blocker, he is basically a non-factor without the ball in his hands...Will usually run crisp routes but he will glide out of his breaks, ...Keeps his head on a swivel to locate the ball, but is more effective as a receiver in the open field, as he does not show the same burst as smaller receivers when catching in the short area ...Not really an explosive player, but does use his body lean and initial contact strike to create separation. Those were just the negatives of both. They had a lot of positives. We are just not seeing them for whatever reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Funny Royal sounds so much like Thomas....
...Despite his upper-body strength, he struggles to avoid getting a clean release vs. press coverage, which causes him to get redirected in his routes too often for a player with his power ...An inconsistent route-runner who will drift on deep routes and takes soft-angle cuts when going long distances...Is more effective on controlled and short-area routes, but needs to be more consistent when attempting to plant and drive to gain separation ...Tough player, but will have some concentration lapses, along with a penchant for trapping the ball, leading to a share of dropped balls. but will get frustrated when he can't escape the jam to get into his route (lets that affect him for several plays, getting take out of his game). |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
how about Jackson....negatives only...
...Has very good speed, but is still a bit raw running routes and must improve his transition a bit.. The rest of his faults are in regards to his size and bulk and how he gets pushed at the line of scrimmage and how he may shy away from the ball when he hears foot steps. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Newport News,Virginia
Age: 61
Posts: 4,495
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
You certainly hate to hear of trust issues. It sounds like hes a very slow learner.
I was shocked that we even IMO wasted a draft pick on a TE. With already having an elite TE in Cooley and a solid #2 in Yoder. I guess we will have to take a wait and see approach, not much choice at the moment. At the moment all three second round picks in this years class are suspect, I would have been happy with one of the three stepping up and making some contributions to the team this season.
__________________
"There's no greater feeling than moving a man from Point A to Point B, against his will." #68 THANKS COACH GIBBS FOR EVERYTHING! YOUR THE MAN AND ALWAYS WILL BE! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Quote:
Davis is never going to pass Cooley on the depth chart, but it would be nice if we could go base 2 TEs in the post Sellers era. Portis would totally rock in that formation, given that the defense would have one more gap to defend and Portis reads zone blocking as well as any player in the history of the NFL. Right now though, the only solution is just to have Sellers play more.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
*Gasp* Zorn doesn't trust rookies, and lately Zorn has been less open when it comes to the offense so that means......THAT Zorn doesn't trust himself. I see. The ways of the Freudian slip are strong.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Quote:
Zorn isn't the first or last NFL head coach to not trust rookies. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Quote:
But if you're are right, and the offensive line has been that much more offensive over the last two games that it's ruining everything Zorn would like to do, I would think he HAS to start benching players like Rabach and Jansen, right? He wouldn't go through the rest of the season just trying to playcall around piss poor talent on the OL, would he? Because that would get very ugly, very fast. This team would be basically unwatchable for the remainder.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Quote:
OH, I see now EVERYONE wants to talk about the O-Line. How typical
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,584
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
^ you know Dirtbag....for some weird unknown reason....I understood that. scarey.
Funny but scarey. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,351
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
I think we're getting a bit worked up over some rookies that generally take a while to develop. You can question drafting some of them, but i think they deserve a little time before we start jumping all over them.
Davis, from what i can tell, has some serious skills, but he's behind Cooley for good reason. Zorn is a stickler and if he doesn't see things in practice, you're not playing. I would have thought we'd see some two TE sets, w/ CC and Davis on the field together more, but hey, it's not happening for a reason. Zorn pointed this out. By next year we should see some improvements. Let's just hope they get on the field a little to get some experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: commonwealth of va
Posts: 795
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
if you go by what all 3 have done for the team so far,it's 3 wasted picks.thomas is promising,the other two don't come close to that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 422
|
Re: Why Did We Draft Fred Davis?
From what I understand, the main reason Fred Davis has been elusive is because he doen't know the play book yet. This is just what I heard, but if it is true, wouldn't you think someone would have picked up the fact that hes a dumbass before we drafted him?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|