|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: Do we need better wide receivers? | |||
| Our wide receivers are great, it's everything else that stinks. |
   
|
2 | 4.08% |
| Our wide receivers are good, but unspectacular. |
  
|
24 | 48.98% |
| Our wide receivers are average. |
  
|
16 | 32.65% |
| Our wide receivers are sub-par and we need some new talent. |
  
|
7 | 14.29% |
| Our wide receivers stink, get rid of them. |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
11-22-2004, 04:11 PM
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
When this group of wide receivers can be as consistant as what the posse was, then I'll say they are the best in the league.
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 04:16 PM
|
#2 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Let's compare the stats of our top 2 receivers with some of the other top 2 receivers that many on this board say we're light years behind:
Redskins Coles: 52 catches, 606 yds, 1 TD Gardner: 32 catches, 436 yards, 5 TD Patriots Givens: 42 catches, 710 yds, 3 TD Patten: 29 catches, 473 yds, 5 TD Seahawks Jackson: 51 catches, 742 yds, 4 TD Robinson: 31 catches, 495 yds, 2 TD Chiefs Gonzalez: 49 catches, 647 yds, 5 TD Morton: 43 catches, 581 yds, 2 TD Steelers Ward: 57 catches, 678 yds, 3 TD Burress: 32 catches, 601 yds, 4 TD
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 04:20 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,101
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 04:54 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
Coles-Targets: 110 Drops: 6, Percent Caught 47.3 Gardner-Targets: 75 Drops: 6, Percent Caught 42.7 Patten-Targets: 63 Drops: 7, Percent Caught 46.0 Givens-Targets: 75 Drops: 1 Percent Caught: 56 Jackson-Targets: 99 Drops: 6, Percent Caught: 51.5 Robinson-Targets: 66 Drops: 10 Percent Caught: 47 Morton-Targets: 58 Drops: 0 Percent Caught: 74.1 Ward-Targets: 67 Drops: 1 Percent Caught: 85.1 Burress-Targets: 57 Drops: 2 Percent Caught: 56.1
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 06:12 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
|
Quote:
Interested to find out how many years this includes....what about stats of drops for this year? |
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 06:16 PM
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2004, 06:54 PM
|
#7 | |
|
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,101
|
Quote:
Thanks Smootsmack. Nice find. Did anyone else notice who had the lowest percentage? Uhh yeah Gardner. Here Gardners new nickname: 42.7/57.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
