Do we need upgrades at wide receiver?

[SkinsRock]

Ok, so now that we finally have Brunell on the bench, we're questioning and criticizing the WR's after ONE full game with Ramsey??? Without a doubt there have been way too many drops, but give it time. Brunells accuracy was for shit, and they've had just one week of work to adjust back to Ramsey's right-handed, strong-armed throwing style. I'm certainly not trying to make excuses for the drops, but a little patience please!!!

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by SkinsRock

Ok, so now that we finally have Brunell on the bench, we're questioning and criticizing the WR's after ONE full game with Ramsey??? ... I'm certainly not trying to make excuses for the drops, but a little patience please!!!

After 10 games, please forgive us if our patience has worn a bit thin.

Plus, there has been criticism of our wide receivers long before Ramsey began playing. Gardner's drops, McCants' inconsistency and immaturity, Coles with injury issues and playing hurt, and Jacobs' inability to crack the starting lineup have been regular topics around here.

It's certainly nothing new.

[SkinsRock]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

After 10 games, please forgive us if our patience has worn a bit thin.

Plus, there has been criticism of our wide receivers long before Ramsey began playing. Gardner's drops, McCants' inconsistency and immaturity, Coles with injury issues and playing hurt, and Jacobs' inability to crack the starting lineup have been regular topics around here.

It's certainly nothing new.

I understand, but it seems that now since the QB switch has been made, and Ramsey played...ummm...efficiently (which Brunell failed to do), the focus of the passing game issues (on the Warpath) has been turned to the WR's. Of course there are, and have been issues there, but now there are multiple threads about them, whereas before, it seemed like 90% of the focus was on Brunell's shortcomings and what Ramsey could do.
We have a good group of wide receivers, but they have been struggling, as has the ENTIRE OFFENSE from the play calling on down. Yeah, Portis is pushing 1,000 yards, but TWO rushing TD's after 10 games?!? Come on! It's all of them....but that does not mean they don't have the talent and potential to turn it around and start playing well.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by SkinsRock

I understand, but it seems that now since the QB switch has been made, and Ramsey played...ummm...efficiently (which Brunell failed to do), the focus of the passing game issues (on the Warpath) has been turned to the WR's. Of course there are, and have been issues there, but now there are multiple threads about them, whereas before, it seemed like 90% of the focus was on Brunell's shortcomings and what Ramsey could do.
We have a good group of wide receivers, but they have been struggling, as has the ENTIRE OFFENSE from the play calling on down. Yeah, Portis is pushing 1,000 yards, but TWO rushing TD's after 10 games?!? Come on! It's all of them....but that does not mean they don't have the talent and potential to turn it around and start playing well.

I hear ya, dude. Yes, nobody on offense is safe from criticism. And I agree with you, as mundane as the passing game was against the Eagles, Ramsey was still 1000 times better than Brunell. Ramsey's completion percentage, 21 for 34, is something Brunell couldn't do in 5 games -- and that was with multiple drops from wideouts and running backs.

You're also correct about playcalling. I heard the Eagles were something like 23rd in the NFL against the run. Yet we had a grand total of 51 yards on 22 rushes. I hate to admit that Joe Gibbs called a bad game, but I've never seen him ignore such an obvious weak spot in an opponent and fail to exploit it.

The wideouts are simply another facet of an incompetent, buffoon-like offense that just happens to be the focus of all the bitching this week.