Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Do we need upgrades at wide receiver?

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Do we need better wide receivers?
Our wide receivers are great, it's everything else that stinks. 2 4.08%
Our wide receivers are good, but unspectacular. 24 48.98%
Our wide receivers are average. 16 32.65%
Our wide receivers are sub-par and we need some new talent. 7 14.29%
Our wide receivers stink, get rid of them. 0 0%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-23-2004, 10:16 PM   #15
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
Hmmmm, Ward has an 85.1% completion rate where as both Coles and Gardner are in the 40% range for completions.
Just so you know, those stats are misleading. Those stats also represent QB ACCURACY. Hines Ward's & Co.'s catch percentages are representative of their QB.

Considering how much we've assailed Brunell (who started 9 of 10 games) and Ramsey for their accuracy (who collectively have the worst completion percentage in the league for starters), you can't reference the percentage caught as an indication of the WR's hands.

Roethlisberger has a 69% completion percentage whereas Burnell had a 49% completion percentage. That says it all.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.18209 seconds with 12 queries