![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Ravens are ranked 27th in the leauge in passing. Flacco has had very few 200+ yard games in passing. Maybe they have had shorter fields to go, but they also faced a bunch of weak teams...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
He is making passes when he needs to and he is a rookie getting better every week. With Flacco 8-4 without 6-10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
plus their D is still a wrecking ball of a unit even with gregg out. when we play them it will be a great game. go skins!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Matty:
I agree that the Skins should not take that trade - - but for those who think Campbell is not up to the job, this would be a potential "quick fix". And we do know that the Skins have been known to jump at the "quick fix" option in the past...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Well, 4th year Campbell is significantly better than Rookie Flacco, but Flacco certainly isn't struggling...I mean he's having the best year of any QB in his division. And I think you have to credit the offense around him for that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
The offense around him has been the nfl worst, since the inception of the Ravens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Right, but this isn't 2002. Clayton/Mason are a very competent WR duo, and the Ravens have a strong, retooled OL.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
The Moss-Randle El duo were supposed to be just as lethal as those two are. I don't think a retooled OL alone is going to make JC a great QB and I do not want to wait for another 2-3 seasons for them to retool the OL only to find JC still is inadequate. Evaluate JC the rest of the way then the FO has to make a decision about him and they should open the QB position for competition in the preseason. Either the kid has it or he doesn't. Patrick Ramsey didn't get half the sympathy this kid gets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, MD
Posts: 2,061
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Quote:
We are trying to find ways to improve his productivity. Giving him more time would be one. Allowing his young receivers to develop another. I'm not even sure why rebuilding the OL would be a bad thing even if they QB was a problem. Anyway, Randle El is thriving in his 3-5 targets a game role in the offense. Cooley is having a good season. Moss has been explosive. Campbell has fueled all three of these things. I think dependability is an issue that Moss cannot fix. Obviously someone needs to step up and help Campbell, and I'm confident that someone will soon, in the same way that Mason has stepped up and helped out Flacco. I'm guessing that Campbell-Moss though is never going to be an elite passing combination. I have optimism that Campbell-Kelly will be.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Huh? Mason is no Santana Moss. The running backs have been injured all season and if they weren't they're no Portis. So who in the hell he has for help. Last time i checked Ray Lewis and Reed dont play offense.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: JC is not what I thought part two
Mason is more reliable than Santana Moss, and in our ball control offense, he would be more valuable to us. Clayton is the better Moss comparison anyway, as he's just as explosive, but has enjoyed a better season IMO.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|