Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


There's No Quarterback Controversy

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2008, 02:40 PM   #1
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I think the question should be is JC a playmaker or not? Or does JC need everything around him to be clicking in order to win games and play well?

I think he's shown that when the blocking and run game is working well he's a pretty decent qb.
Hell who couldn't be a decent Qb when theres blocking and good running? Its called Improvising. Take what you have and make it work. He doesn't and isn't capable of doing this. Next!
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 03:16 PM   #2
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 4,628
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
Hell who couldn't be a decent Qb when theres blocking and good running? Its called Improvising. Take what you have and make it work. He doesn't and isn't capable of doing this. Next!
Then what do you call the first 8 games of this year?

Campbell is very capable, and has improvised successfully (again, I point to the first 8 games of the year). It's very hard to imagine any QB being successful with a injury-ridden offensive line that can't block a tic-tac-toe game and a run game that has been stopped by 4 of the best defenses in the league. When the protection is there, Campbell is moving the ball.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:18 PM   #3
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by prinzeofmoval View Post
He doesn't and isn't capable of doing this. Next!
Wait, I thought we were talking about Jason Campbell. But this sounds like were talking about some people on this site, and the way they understand football.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 12:15 AM   #4
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Wait, I thought we were talking about Jason Campbell. But this sounds like were talking about some people on this site, and the way they understand football.
lol these threads really do go nowhere huh?
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 03:10 PM   #5
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I think the question should be is JC a playmaker or not? Or does JC need everything around him to be clicking in order to win games and play well?

I think he's shown that when the blocking and run game is working well he's a pretty decent qb.
after countless threads and posts about JC i think we have the question properly narrowed down (atleast in my mind): does JC need everything around him to be working for him to be successful?

most qbs can look good when the runningback runs for 130+ and the D makes the opposing offense earn their TDs.
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 10:43 AM   #6
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsk1 View Post
I think the question should be is JC a playmaker or not? Or does JC need everything around him to be clicking in order to win games and play well?

I think he's shown that when the blocking and run game is working well he's a pretty decent qb.

It just so happens that Scouts Inc agrees with you.

Originally from ESPN Insider:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scouts Inc
Washington
• The Redskins used a variety of five- and three-step drops and play-action passes to offset the aggressive Ravens defense, but they were unable to consistently keep Campbell clean in the pocket. It seemed that when Campbell had time he was able to be effective, especially early on, but he didn't have enough support from the running game to keep the Baltimore defense off-balance.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 11:11 AM   #7
Twilbert07
Impact Rookie
 
Twilbert07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 61
Posts: 594
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

The Bengals D is nothing like the tough defenses we've played recently, so this will be Jason Campbell's chance to shine. It will be a big boost if he can throw a couple TD passes and lead us to more than 20 points.
__________________
a Skins fan every day, every way.
Twilbert07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 02:04 PM   #8
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilbert07 View Post
The Bengals D is nothing like the tough defenses we've played recently, so this will be Jason Campbell's chance to shine. It will be a big boost if he can throw a couple TD passes and lead us to more than 20 points.
True, but if I am the Bengals D-coordinator, I'm telling my guys to bring the heat off the edges. With Heyer and Fabini in as our tackles, Jason is going to get killed.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 09:04 PM   #9
charlielyons
Special Teams
 
charlielyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 394
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

his auburn stats:;:::Jason Campbell #17 QB

CAREER STATS
YARDS TOUCHDOWNS
7,299 45



Birth Date December 31, 1981
Birth Place Laurel, MS
Height 6-5
Weight 228 lbs.
Age 23
Class Senior

ProfileStatsGame Log

Stats Overview Passing
YEAR CMP ATT YDS CMP% YPA LNG TD INT SACK RAT
2001 0 142 1117 0.0 7.87 72 4 4 15 69.74
2002 94 149 1215 63.1 8.15 54 11 5 14 149.23
2003 181 293 2267 61.8 7.74 68 10 8 25 132.57
2004 188 270 2700 69.6 10.00 87 20 7 13 172.89




.
charlielyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 10:43 PM   #10
skins6
Camp Scrub
 
skins6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 24
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Campbell Out--collins In
skins6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 12:27 AM   #11
SkinDogg
Special Teams
 
SkinDogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 469
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins6 View Post
Campbell Out--collins In
Did you even watch the end of last season?
SkinDogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 12:30 AM   #12
prinzeofmoval
Special Teams
 
prinzeofmoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 432
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinDogg View Post
Did you even watch the end of last season?
yes its called being healthy.
__________________
I laugh at you Colt Brennan haters. You're the same guys who didn't wanna bench Brunell for Campbell. The tables will turn.
prinzeofmoval is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 09:54 AM   #13
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

how about just trying to throw past the first down markers! why is it if we need 8 yards we pass for 3 if we need 3 yards we pass for 2 and so on. The best passer in the league will have a losing season. Frustrating!
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 10:23 AM   #14
DieHardSkin
Camp Scrub
 
DieHardSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

Why do we keep making excuses for JC (4 different offenses, no offensive line, etc.). Face it!! He is a mediocre quarterback who has a long throwing motion, doesn't sense pressure, and doesn’t move well in the pocket like good quarterbacks....AKA Tony Romo & Big Ben for a few examples. Average quarterbacks (Mark Rypien) can look good with a running game, and good offensive line. The question is can Jason be a good QB with an average offensive line, and average running game? My answer would be NO.....
DieHardSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2008, 10:52 AM   #15
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Re: There's No Quarterback Controversy

I think it's funny that people will say that Jason "needs the entire offense to click to be any good." That's how 90% of the quarterbacks in the NFL work. Every one of them needs help, not necessarily from the run game, but it can also come from superior receivers.

Let's take a look at teams who don't run well:
-Arizona: Both of there starters are better than Santana Moss (head and shoulders maybe) and I'd go so far as to assert that Steve Breaston would be an upgrade over Randle El.
-Colts: No one has ever said Jason Campbell is Peyton Manning, but for the sake of argument, Wayne is better than Moss right now, Clark is more productive than Cooley, and Harrison/Gonzo are better than any 2/3 receivers the Skins have. AND, now that they're healthy they have one of the best pass protecting offensive lines in the league.
-Lions: Horrible football team.
-Bengals: Horrible football team.
-Rams: Horrible football team.

There are your bottom 5 rushing teams in the NFL. They have Qb's who I would be ecstatic if JC became, amazing receivers, great o lines, or they don't win football games. The last few games, the Skins have been a bad running team and they've seen similar results to the Lions, Bengals and Rams, a balanced offense helps win games unless you've built a passing football team. Unfortunately, the Skins never aspired to be a passing football team, so until one of the best receiving corps and a great o line walks through the door, it's a little bit tough to judge Jason Campbell.

Finally, if you think that Todd Collins would have more success in this system, with no running or pass blocking to go along with a spotty defense, you're out of your mind. No one on this team is playing well and that won't change by switching to a journeyman QB who played 4 or 5 good games.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.03050 seconds with 11 queries