Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


How do y'all feel abot Mike Mcmahon of the Lions?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-26-2004, 02:52 PM   #1
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
No I think you misunderstood. I said IF PR isn't the answer...didn't mean to say he wasn't.....
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2004, 06:45 PM   #2
GoSkins!
The Starter
 
GoSkins!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yorktown, Va
Age: 57
Posts: 1,587
It would be nice to give a young guy like McMahon a chance but we have young talent at the QB poistion now. I think that we really need to go out and find the type of QB that seems to work in the league (young, mobile, strong arm) but you just can't blow your wad on the QB position two years in a row. Time for us to see if Ramsey can make it else we just need to take our lumps till the Brunnel cap problem passes.
GoSkins! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2004, 11:40 AM   #3
lefty
Camp Scrub
 
lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: chester, uk
Age: 49
Posts: 12
isn't brees a free agent this off season, he done wonders for the bolts this year and i cant see him hanging round to back up rivers
lefty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2004, 12:30 PM   #4
Shane
Special Teams
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 277
Tim Hasselbeck deserves his first fair shot for the starting job in next year's preseason. Head to head with Ramsey, I think he would win the battle.

Mike McMahon is yes, another inexperienced quarterback. What we need is a quarterback who is ready to play at a relatively high level next season, so that our quarterback won't be the only facet of the team that is holding us back. Hopefully, we will be ready to roll next year in terms of all the other positions and in terms of game strategy.

Ramsey has to show more than he can just cope - he needs to shine by the end of this season. Otherwise, we will have to trade him because we have to have a player that we know can bring consistency and very solid play. We can't deal Brunell or Hasselbeck, but we could conceivably trade Ramsey.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2004, 01:56 PM   #5
EEich
The Starter
 
EEich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 62
Posts: 1,001
Your implying that we'll know that Ramsey is or isn't the answer by the end of the season. I think he deserves more time than that... meaning a training camp where he gets an offense tailored for his talents. I don't think he got a fair shot this year.

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
No I think you misunderstood. I said IF PR isn't the answer...didn't mean to say he wasn't.....
EEich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2004, 07:32 PM   #6
htownskinfan
JUST LIVIN
 
htownskinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 64
Posts: 4,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEich
Your implying that we'll know that Ramsey is or isn't the answer by the end of the season. I think he deserves more time than that... meaning a training camp where he gets an offense tailored for his talents. I don't think he got a fair shot this year.
I think he deserves more than that too,but that doesnt mean it will happen,if Brunell and ramsey r both here next yr it would not surprise me for gibb's to stick with brunell again the way he defended him this yr
htownskinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.21620 seconds with 11 queries