![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
When did Blache openly work to trade Rogers?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Well, Rogers openly discussed being traded due to Blache's mismanagement of his situation.
So perhaps both parties are responsible for the trade rumors. Either way, this shouldn't have happened.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
i agree i dont like how we've handled Los situation. seems this year there has been alot of non-communication going on between the players and coaches. jansen is benched and not told why, portis not knowing or caring to check in with the coaches to see if he should be on the field or not, portis not knowing whether he should stay and block or chip and release then cites communication errors in coaches telling him to do 2 different things, los getting benched not told why, man i know theres more.
ABOUT D HALL, i originally wasnt for signing him b/c of his attitude (got burnt by a reciever, then missed the tackle then hits the guy late gets falgged all b/c he was made to look stupid), the way he plays off receivers then tries to jump routes for ints (yeah i know ints are great and we need them but not at the expense of hall gambling by baiting a qb), the fact that as talented as he seems he has been bounced around alot in his relatively short career .. . . with all that said, the current situation we are in we now have made a situation where we cant afford to lose hall and create another area of need. we just are not set up cap or draft wise to beable to handle another area of need beyond OL, DT, OLB. go skins!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Carlos Rogers was not "mishandled" or "misused" his play was horrible which is why he got benched, and his hands were a liability as well. Ranking 4th overall defensively tells me Blache is doing something right. As for Hall, we can agree to disagree, but if you look at production over the course of 3 years Hall is at least a top 15 corner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Quote:
It's baffling to me that you can be so wrong on so many things in a short post, but I'll at least respect your right to disagree with me.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Carlos "Stone Hands" Rogers was actually a pretty good corner. I was looking for, but could not find, the article demonstrating that, in many ways Rogers was a top 10 corner. At the time of his benching, I thought he was doing very well in stopping receivers and, when the inevitable catches did happen, he made some nice tackles to limit YAC.
IMHO, if the guy caught half of the balls that hit him in the hands, he would be a pro-bowl corner.... or a star in the sequel "Brokeback Mountain II".
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Quote:
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
A little too much discussion of nuts and balls going around here....
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Quote:
![]() LOL. :headbange
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
haha that last part was wrong on some many levels, lol.
go skins!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 5,923
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
it's be best IMO to just leave the 2ndary alone. maybe draft some young talent in later rounds.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)
You know, you're right...
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|