Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2009, 11:03 AM   #1
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

When did Blache openly work to trade Rogers?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 11:06 AM   #2
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
When did Blache openly work to trade Rogers?
Well, Rogers openly discussed being traded due to Blache's mismanagement of his situation.

So perhaps both parties are responsible for the trade rumors. Either way, this shouldn't have happened.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 12:07 PM   #3
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

i agree i dont like how we've handled Los situation. seems this year there has been alot of non-communication going on between the players and coaches. jansen is benched and not told why, portis not knowing or caring to check in with the coaches to see if he should be on the field or not, portis not knowing whether he should stay and block or chip and release then cites communication errors in coaches telling him to do 2 different things, los getting benched not told why, man i know theres more.

ABOUT D HALL, i originally wasnt for signing him b/c of his attitude (got burnt by a reciever, then missed the tackle then hits the guy late gets falgged all b/c he was made to look stupid), the way he plays off receivers then tries to jump routes for ints (yeah i know ints are great and we need them but not at the expense of hall gambling by baiting a qb), the fact that as talented as he seems he has been bounced around alot in his relatively short career .. . . with all that said, the current situation we are in we now have made a situation where we cant afford to lose hall and create another area of need. we just are not set up cap or draft wise to beable to handle another area of need beyond OL, DT, OLB.

go skins!!
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 12:29 PM   #4
vallin21
The Starter
 
vallin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,198
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Carlos Rogers was not "mishandled" or "misused" his play was horrible which is why he got benched, and his hands were a liability as well. Ranking 4th overall defensively tells me Blache is doing something right. As for Hall, we can agree to disagree, but if you look at production over the course of 3 years Hall is at least a top 15 corner.
vallin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:27 PM   #5
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Carlos Rogers was not "mishandled" or "misused" his play was horrible which is why he got benched, and his hands were a liability as well. Ranking 4th overall defensively tells me Blache is doing something right. As for Hall, we can agree to disagree, but if you look at production over the course of 3 years Hall is at least a top 15 corner.
I would hardly say his play was horrible. No one will argue that he has bad hands, but he was being talked about as a pro-bowl caliber player emerging as an elite defender during the first half of the season. He may have faded a bit and had a rift with Blache prior to being benched, but calling him horrible is a huge overstatement IMO.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 09:30 PM   #6
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by vallin21 View Post
Carlos Rogers was not "mishandled" or "misused" his play was horrible which is why he got benched, and his hands were a liability as well. Ranking 4th overall defensively tells me Blache is doing something right. As for Hall, we can agree to disagree, but if you look at production over the course of 3 years Hall is at least a top 15 corner.
I'm sorry you have a great player right under your nose and can't see it, but I'm going to let the back and forth die here. Clearly, you don't respect talent when you see it, but I'll try not to get worked up over it.

It's baffling to me that you can be so wrong on so many things in a short post, but I'll at least respect your right to disagree with me.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 01:58 PM   #7
JoeRedskin
Contains football related knowledge
 
JoeRedskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Carlos "Stone Hands" Rogers was actually a pretty good corner. I was looking for, but could not find, the article demonstrating that, in many ways Rogers was a top 10 corner. At the time of his benching, I thought he was doing very well in stopping receivers and, when the inevitable catches did happen, he made some nice tackles to limit YAC.

IMHO, if the guy caught half of the balls that hit him in the hands, he would be a pro-bowl corner....

or a star in the sequel "Brokeback Mountain II".
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.
JoeRedskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:29 PM   #8
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeRedskin View Post
Carlos "Stone Hands" Rogers was actually a pretty good corner. I was looking for, but could not find, the article demonstrating that, in many ways Rogers was a top 10 corner. At the time of his benching, I thought he was doing very well in stopping receivers and, when the inevitable catches did happen, he made some nice tackles to limit YAC.

IMHO, if the guy caught half of the balls that hit him in the hands, he would be a pro-bowl corner....

or a star in the sequel "Brokeback Mountain II".
Agreed. Basically he has to "grow" hands and he'll be pro-bowler and that's a big reason why i think it's nuts to show him the door now. Really nuts. Really, really nuts.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:40 PM   #9
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
Agreed. Basically he has to "grow" hands and he'll be pro-bowler and that's a big reason why i think it's nuts to show him the door now. Really nuts. Really, really nuts.
A little too much discussion of nuts and balls going around here....
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:57 PM   #10
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
A little too much discussion of nuts and balls going around here....
Hey this is after all a thread about "low-balling". Stop being such a

LOL. :headbange
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 05:37 PM   #11
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Hey this is after all a thread about "low-balling". Stop being such a

LOL. :headbange
That's what I meant- low-balling, nuts nuts nuts, numerous balls hitting rogers in the hands... the imagery is disturbing.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 02:51 PM   #12
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

haha that last part was wrong on some many levels, lol.

go skins!!
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 02:56 PM   #13
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 5,923
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

it's be best IMO to just leave the 2ndary alone. maybe draft some young talent in later rounds.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2009, 04:43 PM   #14
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: Redskins "Low-balling" Hall (Allegedly)

You know, you're right...
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.40703 seconds with 11 queries