Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Updated: Discuss our Backup QB Situation (formerly Byron Leftwich)

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2009, 04:37 PM   #1
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Updated: Discuss our Backup QB Situation (formerly Byron Leftwich)

Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1 View Post
I move for a motion for closure on thread. All in favor say aye.
Here's what I propose:

There should be one thread and one thread only discussing our QB situation, be it starter or backup. And no new threads on the topic until there is some actual news to report.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 05:54 PM   #2
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Updated: Discuss our Backup QB Situation (formerly Byron Leftwich)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
Here's what I propose:

There should be one thread and one thread only discussing our QB situation, be it starter or backup. And no new threads on the topic until there is some actual news to report.
Obviously the QB threads are worthy of disscusion since it's seems to bring a lot of ideas and opinions to the table. I agree with GMScud about having one thread on the subject. Until a later date.
44ever is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.81086 seconds with 11 queries