Andre Smith..Would You Take Him At 13?

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I lean this way too. Admitting I don't have any clue about the guy other than the hyper-scrutiny he is going through right now. With the veteran leadership we have on the line...we really have a good set of guys from that standpoint...I think if he is a competitor that just needs to reined in and focsed then yes. If he is captain douche then I look to see if someone wants to trade up for him. Tripp makes a good point. If he isn't a Samuels type but ends up in a Leonard Davis mold we're still a winner. Plus it seems everyone thinks he has a little versatility. sounds like maybe he is suited to G but could probably role to T in a pinch...or vice versa. Guys like that are invaluable.

I heard one of the guys covering the combine- I think it was Mariucci- say that he thinks Andre Smith could be a pro-bowl caliber guard right now. That's something to consider. If we snagged him and he wasn't quite ready to start at T, he could always help at the guard spot. Kendall and R.Thomas aren't getting any younger.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by GMScud

I heard one of the guys covering the combine- I think it was Mariucci- say that he thinks Andre Smith could be a pro-bowl caliber guard right now. That's something to consider. If we snagged him and he wasn't quite ready to start at T, he could always help at the guard spot. Kendall and R.Thomas aren't getting any younger.

Ok but we need a RT probably more than anything else on the o-line right? The worst we can do at LG and RG is Kendell and Thomas, hoping Kendell's knees don't disintegrate and Thomas has a rebound year. The worst we can do at RT is Jansen (old, slow in his lateral movement and oft injured) or Heyer (inexperienced, lousy run-blocker and also oft injured :confused. We need a RT and if he's not coming through the draft then we ought to trade down for sure i think.