Dockery Cut:

[Skinny Tee]

Originally Posted by LandrySlice

They are definetly going to make a play for Dockery, but if this thing with Haynesworth has any teeth to it, forget about Dockery, Haynesworth, and Hall. IMPOSSIBLE!

The thing is if you can give them all long deals and focus their newly signed contracts to be minimized year one then you can sign all of these guys.

If they are gambling on the cap not being there next year it won't matter how they loophole the first year cost and stipulate their payments in the second year.


It really looks like they are just trying to acquire all the talent this year regardless of cost in preparation of there being no cap next year. It's smart but it is an aggressive gamble.

[Larry Michael is Satan]

Originally Posted by Skinny Tee

The thing is if you can give them all long deals and focus their newly signed contracts to be minimized year one then you can sign all of these guys.

If they are gambling on the cap not being there next year it won't matter how they loophole the first year cost and stipulate their payments in the second year.


It really looks like they are just trying to acquire all the talent this year regardless of cost in preparation of there being no cap next year. It's smart but it is an aggressive gamble.

If I was a player/agent, I wouldn't be eager to sign a contract that has terms based on an assumption of no salary cap.

Sign Dock and Hall, be realistic and forget about Haynesworth. He'll probably be a Buc, and be a good player for a while, but why give a player who is going to be out of his prime in 2-3 years a long term contract tying up that much money? It's stupid, but so is Vinny.