Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2009, 08:52 AM   #1
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

This makes sense. With Haynesworth and Hall in the fold, and Dockery still on the radar, we're just flat out of cap space. We need a G more than we need Canty at this point.

Woulda been real cool to have him facing Dallas twice a year, but I can't complain about giving him up to get Albert.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 08:58 AM   #2
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
This makes sense. With Haynesworth and Hall in the fold, and Dockery still on the radar, we're just flat out of cap space. We need a G more than we need Canty at this point.

Woulda been real cool to have him facing Dallas twice a year, but I can't complain about giving him up to get Albert.
With Hall locked up we could have booted Springs and signed Canty as well.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 08:58 AM   #3
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
This makes sense. With Haynesworth and Hall in the fold, and Dockery still on the radar, we're just flat out of cap space. We need a G more than we need Canty at this point.

Woulda been real cool to have him facing Dallas twice a year, but I can't complain about giving him up to get Albert.
What is our cap looking like right now?...and Can we release Springs and free up enough to after a quality OL?
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 09:01 AM   #4
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skinny Tee View Post
What is our cap looking like right now?...and Can we release Springs and free up enough to after a quality OL?
Cap is tight right now, maybe room for Dockery, maybe. We could release Springs and gain $6M in space, which will be enough for a big money OL, but I don't think we'll do that.

They still love Springs.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 09:19 AM   #5
Skinny Tee
The Starter
 
Skinny Tee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Redskins Nation
Posts: 1,715
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Cap is tight right now, maybe room for Dockery, maybe. We could release Springs and gain $6M in space, which will be enough for a big money OL, but I don't think we'll do that.

They still love Springs.
Thanks for getting back to me.

I'd still like a high end OL out of free agency. Our draft options would be able to open up a little more if that happens.
__________________
Redskinsly,
_________Skinny Tee_________
Skinny Tee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 09:30 AM   #6
MdBluefinCrab
Camp Scrub
 
MdBluefinCrab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: White Plains, Maryland
Age: 70
Posts: 56
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Cap is tight right now, maybe room for Dockery, maybe. We could release Springs and gain $6M in space, which will be enough for a big money OL, but I don't think we'll do that.

They still love Springs.
I hope you're wrong and they do. Springs is "the monkey on the back" of the Redskins. He hasn't played a full season in how many years? He's a complete waste of $6 million. Each and every year, he refuses to renegotiate his contract and never participates in off season workouts. Just my opinion but Springs should have been let go weeks ago, no matter what the outcome of Hall's status with the team would have been.
Now that they have Hall signed, let him go! Use that $6 million for a FA O-lineman and our 1st round draft pick (hopefully an offensive lineman).
__________________
Bring the Redskins back to Washington!
MdBluefinCrab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 09:44 AM   #7
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Cap is tight right now, maybe room for Dockery, maybe. We could release Springs and gain $6M in space, which will be enough for a big money OL, but I don't think we'll do that.

They still love Springs.
Man, do they love him that much that they are willing to risk not addressing the offensive line?
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 09:49 AM   #8
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Man, do they love him that much that they are willing to risk not addressing the offensive line?
Vinny was on 980, and he mentioned addressing the o-line, but also said he had to do some more work on clearing the cap room. Sounded real tired. I don't really have a link, and before he even mentioned the o-line, he said the draft picks from last year have to take the next step for the offense to be effective.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 11:32 AM   #9
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
Man, do they love him that much that they are willing to risk not addressing the offensive line?
Well there you have it, he's being released. They definitely recognize the need to get younger on the lines (especially headed into an uncapped world) is more valuable than having Springs around for just a season more or two.

I like the move, I'm just surprised they were able to part with a player the coaches loved so much. Good job by the front office in making a business decision.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 11:36 AM   #10
GMScud
Swearinger
 
GMScud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Well there you have it, he's being released. They definitely recognize the need to get younger on the lines (especially headed into an uncapped world) is more valuable than having Springs around for just a season more or two.

I like the move, I'm just surprised they were able to part with a player the coaches loved so much. Good job by the front office in making a business decision.
I think we could have (and wanted to) keep Springs around if he would have restructrured like everyone else over 30 on our roster. He refused to take any kind of pay cut. I seriously doubt he finds $6M per year anywhere else.
__________________
Tardy
GMScud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2009, 11:47 AM   #11
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Canty "does not appear to be in Washington's plans now"

Quote:
Originally Posted by GMScud View Post
I think we could have (and wanted to) keep Springs around if he would have restructrured like everyone else over 30 on our roster. He refused to take any kind of pay cut. I seriously doubt he finds $6M per year anywhere else.
There's a difference between a restructure and a pay cut. Redskins had wanted Springs to take a straight cut.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.52922 seconds with 11 queries