Another Haynesworth Thread: Will AH Be The Next Dana Stubblefield?

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

I don't think he's going to live up to his contract. I hope he does but history shows this isn't going to work out. I was reading an article about AH in The Post today and this guy has some issues. No way in hell am I paying a guy that much money unless I know I can 100% count on him. He has or had some anger issues where he's kicking and stomping on guys, fighting with teammates in practice, not playing the scheme of the defense, not listening to coaches....way too many red flags but our FO doesn't seem to care.

Dude, this negativity is getting old. I honestly don't know why you even bother being a Redskins fan. You're entitled to your opinion and no one tells you that you have to like this deal, but you keep posting negative comments and now you've decided to create this thread on something that has been repeatedly brought up by other people in other AH threads and discussed repeatedly.

Look, why don't you go and become a Giants fan, since yesterday you were praising them so much because apparently they are going to be 5-deep in every position along their defensive line and you won't have to worry about AH becoming a bust.

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by Ruhskins

Dude, this negativity is getting old. I honestly don't know why you even bother being a Redskins fan. You're entitled to your opinion and no one tells you that you have to like this deal, but you keep posting negative comments and now you've decided to create this thread on something that has been repeatedly brought up by other people in other AH threads and discussed repeatedly.

Look, why don't you go and become a Giants fan, since yesterday you were praising them so much because apparently they are going to be 5-deep in every position along their defensive line and you won't have to worry about AH becoming a bust.

You're right....I'm entitled to my opinion. Sorry you don't like it. I guess the truth hurts. And I wasn't praising the Giants.

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

You're right....I'm entitled to my opinion. Sorry you don't like it. I guess the truth hurts. And I wasn't praising the Giants.

I think he was referring to me.

Ruhskins:

The Giants signed Boley and Bernard all they have left is Canty. Like I said yesterday, if he's signed that Giants D will be unbelievable. Don't tell me it won't? Be realistic, we need to shore our OL to counteract them. My point was we put all our eggs into 2 signing when we could have been doing what the Giants have done smartly and will do if Canty is signed. Filling many holes which we have still.

I hate the Giants by the way!!

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I think he was referring to me.

Ruhskins:

The Giants signed Boley and Bernard all they have left is Canty. Like I said yesterday, if he's signed that Giants D will be unbelievable. Don't tell me it won't? Be realistic, we need to shore our OL to counteract them. My point was we put all our eggs into 2 signing when we could have been doing what the Giants have done smartly and will do if Canty is signed. Filling many holes which we have still.

I hate the Giants by the way!!

I agree with your post 100%. Giants did it the right way IMO.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I think he was referring to me.

Ruhskins:

The Giants signed Boley and Bernard all they have left is Canty. Like I said yesterday, if he's signed that Giants D will be unbelievable. Don't tell me it won't? Be realistic, we need to shore our OL to counteract them. My point was we put all our eggs into 2 signing when we could have been doing what the Giants have done smartly and will do if Canty is signed. Filling many holes which we have still.

I hate the Giants by the way!!

Whoops, my bad.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

I think he was referring to me.

Ruhskins:

The Giants signed Boley and Bernard all they have left is Canty. Like I said yesterday, if he's signed that Giants D will be unbelievable. Don't tell me it won't? Be realistic, we need to shore our OL to counteract them. My point was we put all our eggs into 2 signing when we could have been doing what the Giants have done smartly and will do if Canty is signed. Filling many holes which we have still.

I hate the Giants by the way!!

And if they don't sign Canty, the Giants will also have only made two signings and still won't have addressed their needs at WR, LT, or in the secondary

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

And if they don't sign Canty, the Giants will also have only made two signings and still won't have addressed their needs at WR, LT, or in the secondary

Don't forget Mario Manningham (could be great, could be a bust) LT? They have the best OL according to all the experts, CB they are pretty good, I guess they could use one more. It's not like they have many holes like us and they can address those needs in this upcoming draft.

[SmootSmack]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Don't forget Mario Manningham (could be great, could be a bust) LT? They have the best OL according to all the experts, CB they are pretty good, I guess they could use one more. It's not like they have many holes like us and they can address those needs in this upcoming draft.

If Mario Manningham is going to be their next Plaxico, more power to them. I didn't forget him, but then I hope you're not forgetting Thomas, Kelly, and Davis. They are looking to add depth to both their OL (ideally move Diehl inside and McKenzie to the bench, I think that's what I heard) and their secondary (particularly at safety where they are very young and inexperienced)

Really how many holes do we have that they don't have? And why can't we address needs in the draft? I understand they have more picks than we do right now but it's not like we don't have any picks and can't get more

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

If Mario Manningham is going to be their next Plaxico, more power to them. I didn't forget him, but then I hope you're not forgetting Thomas, Kelly, and Davis. They are looking to add depth to both their OL (ideally move Diehl inside and McKenzie to the bench, I think that's what I heard) and their secondary (particularly at safety where they are very young and inexperienced)

Really how many holes do we have that they don't have? And why can't we address needs in the draft? I understand they have more picks than we do right now but it's not like we don't have any picks and can't get more

Kenny Phillips was a stud as a rookie for them and Michael Johnson was solid. We are weak at LB with the loss of Washington, McIntosh had a bad year and Fletch is getting up there in age, on the DE Taylor and Carter are undersized and getting up in age, Evans might be gone, Daniels is Pre-historic. We need two OL players and RB I would start finding someone for the future.

We can argue about this till we are blue in the face, but if don't address those holes in the draft, we will still lose to the Giants despite our FA signings. They have made some nice moves themselves and if they sign Canty, that would be quite a D.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

You're right....I'm entitled to my opinion. Sorry you don't like it. I guess the truth hurts. And I wasn't praising the Giants.

No, what hurts is seeing another tired repetitive thread on the same stuff that's been discussed. But hey, maybe he will become a bust and hopefully that'll satisfy you.

[Skins fan 44]

Who knows.!? I think everyone is thinking about stubby first. I think he has a lot to prove and is wanting to show why he is worth all the money. Of course i guess we would not expect him to act any other way. I was talking to a Giants fan and I brought it up about stubby and he told be other other wise and how AH wants a ring so that got me thinking. Didnt Stubby already have everything?