Cowboys cut T.O.

[sancho2613]

Awww sad news the Redskins aren't interested in TO... :tongue Cerrato: 'No Interest' In T.O.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

POS is dead on! You look at that list damn near half the league, won't touch the clown.

Then you have 4 or so really good teams left that aren't on the list....you have to wonder about a team like ole the pats, maybe pitts...and if they might make a run at this retard..?

What team would waste 9.5 million for a 10 TD 2008 player who is second to Jerry Rice in TD's? This motherf ker has to be a parasite in the lockeroom and we already know he's said in public!

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

Never mind, a more up to date list.... and YES of course the iggles earned there spot.

T.O.? THE ANSWER IS NO. | Philadelphia Inquirer | 03/05/2009

Posted by Mike Florio on March 5, 2009, 11:17 a.m. EST

As we’re doing with Mike Vick, we’ll be keeping a running tally of all of the teams that have said ”thanks” followed immediately by “no thanks” to the possibility of signing receiver Terrell Owens.

Please note that this only reflects teams that already have said that they’re not interested:

The Dallas Cowboys. (Duh.)

The New York Giants.

The Washington Redskins.

The Baltimore Ravens.

The San Francisco 49ers.

The Minnesota Vikings.

The Atlanta Falcons.

The Cleveland Browns.

The San Diego Chargers.

The Philadelphia Eagles.

The New York Jets.

The Tennessee Titans.

The St. Louis Rams.

Here are the teams that likely will join the list soon:

The Miami Dolphins.

Pretty sad if you think about it,I mean really these teams have come out and sad ..."no matter how bad we are...WE DON"T WANT YOU"!

[dblanch66]

This is a guy who epitomizes the "me first" attitude I despise in any sport. His "antics" are more annoying and childish than entertaining to me but then again I come from a time when football was about the hogs and Riggins and Roger Craig and Ronnie Lott. A clown like "to" would have been just bitch slapped by players like Lott, Manley, Mark Murphy, Fencik etc. In today's NFL, he can't be touched.

[saden1]

What a stupid list...would expect teams that want him to say they do? Everyone is evaluating the pros and cons of having TO on their team.

[Redskins8588]

On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by Redskins8588

On a more serious note, what about attempting to go after Mr. Holt?

Report: Torry Holt seeking release from St. Louis Rams - ESPN

I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

[Redskins8588]

Originally Posted by GMScud

I mentioned this earlier in the thread. I'm pretty sure we're going to stand pat at WR, but if there was one FA I'd sign, it would be Holt.

I agree that we are probably not going to go after a WR, but if we did I wouldn't mind Holt coming in and helping the younger guys and take some pressure off of Moss...

[53Fan]

I don't think Holt would be cheap but he is a hell of a receiver. I heard someone say after what Housh and Coles got, Holt thinks he could get a good contract too.

[FRPLG]

I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

[GMScud]

Originally Posted by FRPLG

I think we have solid evidence now about something many of us have long suspected. At least 13.33% of our members are complete and total bozos. I guess 14 people on here were actually born with only 43 chromosomes.

Make that 14.02%.

I wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

[44ever]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by 44ever

My guess would be there are a lot of Redskins fans that would Love to have TO on the Skins but wont admit it. Or at least entertain the thought. IMO.

I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

[44ever]

Originally Posted by GusFrerotte

I voted NO, but I will admit being tempted. Our WR corp outside of Moss is average at best. TO is crazy though and needs constant attention like the baby he is. He likes to cause shit to in order to get that attention. Overall he didn't make that great of an impact in Dallas last season either. His skills are unbelievable, but with his attitude those skills are negated for the most part, thus my unequivocal NO.

I voted no also. Entertained the thought myself. But thats as far as it went.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by GMScud

Make that 14.02%.

I guess wish some of these folks voting "yes" would grow some nads (maybe that's the genetic defect caused by only having 43 chromosomes) and explain themselves.

Funny. TO would piss off Moss and ARE with his antics. I think the Holt angle would be beneficial though.