Cowboys cut T.O.

Monksdown · 03-05-2009, 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Why not sign Marvin Harrison, instead of T.O.? What's the difference? One is a certified headcase, the other is the quiet assassin. If we haven't signed Marvin Harrison by now why would we sign TO?

The difference is Marvin Harrison needs to be delivered the ball in a relatively small window compared to Terrell. I like Marvin more as a man, but not as a player. Especially not as a player with Jason Campbell throwing him the ball. Terrell makes plays. Marvin helped Peyton finish plays.

Slingin Sammy 33 · 03-05-2009, 10:14 AM

Owens will not wind up here. Period. The FO realizes the disaster that would be, plus the guy makes a lot of drops.

Giantone · 03-05-2009, 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Just stop, he's not coming here. And I doubt NY would want another head case WR either.

Hell no, and althought I'm dead set against it ,it sounds like they would take Plax back in the fold. If anyone it will be Holt.

44ever · 03-05-2009, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Giantone

Hell no, and althought I'm dead set against it ,it sounds like they would take Plax back in the fold. If anyone it will be Holt.

The teams that don't want Terrell Owens - Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
a list of teams that have made it known to them through "league sources" that they have no interest in Owens. As of right now, that list includes:
The Dallas Cowboys.
The New York Giants.
The Washington Redskins.
The Baltimore Ravens.
The San Francisco 49ers.
The Minnesota Vikings.
The Atlanta Falcons.
The Cleveland Browns

skinsfan_nn · 03-05-2009, 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 44ever

The teams that don't want Terrell Owens - Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
a list of teams that have made it known to them through "league sources" that they have no interest in Owens. As of right now, that list includes:
The Dallas Cowboys.
The New York Giants.
The Washington Redskins.
The Baltimore Ravens.
The San Francisco 49ers.
The Minnesota Vikings.
The Atlanta Falcons.
The Cleveland Browns

Where the hell is the sorry ass iggles. They have at least earned a second ranked spot in this list..?

He certainly won't land in the NFC EAST!

44ever · 03-05-2009, 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan_nn

Where the hell is the sorry ass iggles. They have at least earned a second ranked spot in this list..?

He certainly won't land in the NFC EAST!

Huh, your right. Maybe McNabb wants him. I agree no NFC EAST for Owens. I was actually looking forward to watching Hall shut him down. Oh well.

ingibbswetrust · 03-05-2009, 09:38 AM

Rotoworld and Mike and Mike are saying its a possibility of TO coming to the Skins.

Monkeydad · 03-05-2009, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ingibbswetrust

Rotoworld and Mike and Mike are saying its a possibility of TO coming to the Skins.

Yeah, to join Chad Johnson and Anquan Boldin at WR.

We're the target every time ANY higher-priced player becomes available. Don't go off the deep end until Snyder starts talking about it.

SBXVII · 03-05-2009, 09:38 AM

BHA, I think we didn't go after him earlier is cause we had Gibbs to keep Snyder in check when it came to him wanting chemistry type players.

Pocket$, JC may not be strong enough but Zorn loves JC. I question if Zorn is strong enough like the Tuna to control T.O. but I think if T.O. even looked at JC wrong I could see Zorn dealing with T.O. head on. Zorn covets JC as his QB.

12thman, There is a difference in letting a 34-35 y/o DL go who's talent is waning and bringing in a 35 y/o WR who is still considered one of the best at his position.

...and it's also true that everytime he has moved on to new teams the old team was either in shambles or something. Our only saving grace would be that we would still have Kelly and Thomas to pick up where he leaves off. Dallas does have Williams so there WR situation is not as dire as the Eagles was but they still have other positions to fill like DE one of their best just got signed away. CB, one of their best just got signed away. and now WR.

John Denny · 03-05-2009, 09:49 AM

I personally don't want TO. We have too many other holes to fill (OL, OG, OT, DE and probably RB) than to keep signing players to our fantasy team. But who knows what the boy king will do. Anything is possible when he has his hand on the wheel. Even giving up NO. 81 to TO.

SBXVII · 03-05-2009, 09:49 AM

Whatever happened to the whole "Redskins1" thread where people tracked Snyders plane. lol. Half the time we knew who Snyder was looking at prior to the media. lol. I truly miss that thread.

MTK · 03-05-2009, 09:58 AM

We simply can't afford him at this point along with our other needs. Not gonna happen.

SmootSmack · 03-05-2009, 09:59 AM

I'd trust Gibbs to handle TO, and I know Gibbs wasn't an advocate for him, more than I would Zorn at this point.

I wouldn't be upset at bringing TO here, for the right price. But I wouldn't prefer it. We have other more pressing needs. And I don't want us bringing him here just to keep him off the Giants either.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-05-2009, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I'd trust Gibbs to handle TO, and I know Gibbs wasn't an advocate for him, more than I would Zorn at this point.

I wouldn't be upset at bringing TO here, for the right price. But I wouldn't prefer it. We have other more pressing needs. And I don't want us bringing him here just to keep him off the Giants either.

Smoot, we all know that Philly was Super Bowl bound if we hadn't snatched up TJ Ducket! ha ha ha

SFREDSKIN · 03-05-2009, 10:03 AM

I say Raiders or Steelers. He wouldn't dare **** with Tomlin and the Steelers lost Nate Washington.

View Poll Results: T.O. is available, would you want him on the Redskins?
Yes	25	11.36%
No	195	88.64%
Voters: 220. You may not vote on this poll

03-05-2009, 10:14 AM	#2
Slingin Sammy 33 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Virginia Beach Posts: 4,347	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. Owens will not wind up here. Period. The FO realizes the disaster that would be, plus the guy makes a lot of drops. __________________ "I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996.

03-05-2009, 09:38 AM	#7
ingibbswetrust Camp Scrub Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 40	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. Rotoworld and Mike and Mike are saying its a possibility of TO coming to the Skins.

03-05-2009, 09:38 AM	#9
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. BHA, I think we didn't go after him earlier is cause we had Gibbs to keep Snyder in check when it came to him wanting chemistry type players. Pocket$, JC may not be strong enough but Zorn loves JC. I question if Zorn is strong enough like the Tuna to control T.O. but I think if T.O. even looked at JC wrong I could see Zorn dealing with T.O. head on. Zorn covets JC as his QB. 12thman, There is a difference in letting a 34-35 y/o DL go who's talent is waning and bringing in a 35 y/o WR who is still considered one of the best at his position. ...and it's also true that everytime he has moved on to new teams the old team was either in shambles or something. Our only saving grace would be that we would still have Kelly and Thomas to pick up where he leaves off. Dallas does have Williams so there WR situation is not as dire as the Eagles was but they still have other positions to fill like DE one of their best just got signed away. CB, one of their best just got signed away. and now WR.

03-05-2009, 09:49 AM	#10
John Denny Special Teams Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Ocean Pines, MD Posts: 137	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. I personally don't want TO. We have too many other holes to fill (OL, OG, OT, DE and probably RB) than to keep signing players to our fantasy team. But who knows what the boy king will do. Anything is possible when he has his hand on the wheel. Even giving up NO. 81 to TO.

03-05-2009, 09:49 AM	#11
SBXVII Franchise Player Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Virginia Posts: 7,766	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. Whatever happened to the whole "Redskins1" thread where people tracked Snyders plane. lol. Half the time we knew who Snyder was looking at prior to the media. lol. I truly miss that thread.

03-05-2009, 09:58 AM	#12
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,121	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. We simply can't afford him at this point along with our other needs. Not gonna happen. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

03-05-2009, 09:59 AM	#13
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. I'd trust Gibbs to handle TO, and I know Gibbs wasn't an advocate for him, more than I would Zorn at this point. I wouldn't be upset at bringing TO here, for the right price. But I wouldn't prefer it. We have other more pressing needs. And I don't want us bringing him here just to keep him off the Giants either. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

03-05-2009, 10:03 AM	#15
SFREDSKIN Living Legend Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Pacifica, CA Posts: 15,164	Re: Cowboys cut T.O. I say Raiders or Steelers. He wouldn't dare ** with Tomlin and the Steelers lost Nate Washington. __________________ Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth**

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Cowboys cut T.O.

Locker Room Main Forum