Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Cowboys cut T.O.

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: T.O. is available, would you want him on the Redskins?
Yes 25 11.36%
No 195 88.64%
Voters: 220. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-06-2009, 07:59 PM   #29
44ever
Registered User
 
44ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Fortune Teller
Posts: 2,512
Re: Cowboys cut T.O.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinzzFan View Post
I hope to God we don't pick him up, but let's face it someone will. He may not be the receiver he used to be but he's still better than most of the WRs in the league right now. Plus he'll put fans in the seats (not really a problem in the NFL) and his merchandise will sell. Point being he's still one of the faces of the NFL like it or not. Just look at all the responses to this thread and watch NFL Network or ESPN...he's always the story.

I think a contender would be "wise" to sign him to a 1 year deal (with individual and team incentives). He's proven to be a pretty good citizen in his first year with a new team and being his age he really wants a championship.

HAIL!!
Honest post SkinzzFan, If I were the Colts I would sign him to a 2-3 year deal. At his age and with the chance for a SB. I dont think he would have much problem with the deal. Win Win for both. IMO
44ever is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.50049 seconds with 12 queries