Redskins may sign Daniels and Wynn?

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

(See Redskins News on this site.)

How pathetic is that?

I wish that this damn front office would please decide if we're getting younger or putting together another "Over the Hill Gang".

Whatever they decide, signing both Daniels and Wynn isn't going to help get us there. I don't mind signing Daniels as a run-stopping DE but what does the fact that our FO is considering signing both of them say about management's view of the competitiveness of our current team and the futures of our young DE's and DT's?

I also don't get the point of signing Haynesworth if the FO doesn't have a plan to surround him with playmakers who can get to the QB.

I just find the possibility of adding both of these players to our roster troubling because I think it would be a step backwards in the development of our team. Once again, I'm wondering if our front office has a clue, much less a plan.

I defintely think that it is not an ideal situation but I disagree that it doesn't help us, here's why:

I think Wynn still has some gas in the tank (he is on his last few laps though...). He played significant time on the defending Super Bowl Champions. NY would not have picked him up and played him if he was useless. So he was an important part on a good defense.

As for Daniels, I don't think he is done either. I thought he played pretty well in '07 and he essentially spent all of '08 training and rehabilitating because of his ACL.

I look at it this way. They easily could have had Evans and they did not want him, in fact they made no offer. So there was a reason why they wanted to let him go. I will side with Blache on anything defense related as he has earned it.

It is a stop-gap measure but I would rather have these guys on the roster than hope and pray that Wilson and Buzzbee are ready to start.