Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Parking Lot

Parking Lot Off-topic chatter pertaining to movies, TV, music, video games, etc.


taxes and health care

Parking Lot


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-16-2009, 11:43 PM   #1
The Goat
Pro Bowl
 
The Goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
Re: taxes and health care

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
OK name any major goverment program that runs well, cost efficient, or has not not grown way out of wack.
I attended one of the most conservative schools in the country several years ago, was taught by profs who unabashedly expressed their devotion to the right, but at least had the intelligence and honesty to admit Social Security is arguably the most efficient government program not just here but anywhere in the world. It's operating cost is something like one-half of one percent of total "revenue" and basically if we didn't constantly have conservative presidents raiding the surpluses to 1) provide tax cuts to the richest people in the country (many of whom never contribute to SS btw because they never earn W-2 income) 2) fund truly inefficient gov programs like SDI (we've spent over a trillion on SDI and it's not even close to operational) social security would be financially stable for another century.
__________________
24-34
The Goat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 12:07 AM   #2
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
Re: taxes and health care

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I attended one of the most conservative schools in the country several years ago, was taught by profs who unabashedly expressed their devotion to the right, but at least had the intelligence and honesty to admit Social Security is arguably the most efficient government program not just here but anywhere in the world. It's operating cost is something like one-half of one percent of total "revenue" and basically if we didn't constantly have conservative presidents raiding the surpluses to 1) provide tax cuts to the richest people in the country (many of whom never contribute to SS btw because they never earn W-2 income) 2) fund truly inefficient gov programs like SDI (we've spent over a trillion on SDI and it's not even close to operational) social security would be financially stable for another century.
I"m curious to know what you consider to be a conservative school.

To your point, of course the operating cost is miniscule compared to the billions they collect. How much does it cost to take from Peter to give to Paul? Having said that, the operating costs were enough to make Ross Perot a billionaire.

And to claim that any particular spending item was a case of social security being "raided" is extremely misleading. One could just as easily say that Liberals "raided" social security to fund obscene art or overseas abortions.

And if SDI was such a miserable failure, why are the Russians wrapped around the axel about us deploying missile defense in Poland and the Czech Republic? And how were we able to shoot down Scud missiles like 18 years ago during the Gulf War? Admittedly it wasn't 100% effective, but THAT WAS LIKE, 18 YEARS AGO.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2009, 09:58 AM   #3
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: taxes and health care

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goat View Post
I attended one of the most conservative schools in the country several years ago, was taught by profs who unabashedly expressed their devotion to the right, but at least had the intelligence and honesty to admit Social Security is arguably the most efficient government program not just here but anywhere in the world. It's operating cost is something like one-half of one percent of total "revenue" and basically if we didn't constantly have conservative presidents raiding the surpluses to 1) provide tax cuts to the richest people in the country (many of whom never contribute to SS btw because they never earn W-2 income) 2) fund truly inefficient gov programs like SDI (we've spent over a trillion on SDI and it's not even close to operational) social security would be financially stable for another century.
I love how you say coservative presidents have raided SS so I guess you think that Bill Clinton was a conservative. Everyone in Washington is guilty of allowing SS to get raided and thats why its another failing program. I'd also say that their are better ways for Americans to save for retirement other then the rip off program called SS. Maybe you should also look at what a few towns in Texas did when they opted out of SS and they retiring making about double of what SS pays. I'd get out of SS today given the chance but the goverment forces me to dump alot of my money into a program that is going bankrupt but thats ok we can just print more money and save this programe along with other failing goverment programs. Go to this link and go down to the chart and then tell me which retirement program you would perfer to have.
WILLisms.com: Galveston, Texas: Social Security Reform's Living Laboratory.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.13977 seconds with 11 queries