Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-01-2009, 10:05 PM   #10
SkinzzFan
Special Teams
 
SkinzzFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Queensbury, NY
Posts: 273
Re: If we don't get Cutler, should we extend Campbell?

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
Dirtbag, no one is going to give us shit for Campbell. That's the problem here. If every team values Campbell like we do, we'll have to release him next week or so.

When you have an asset that needs to mature, you hold onto to it. That business 101. Cutler's value is at an all time high, and we're actually considering doing that.

I think it will be the 13th pick, a second rounder in 2010, and Carlos Rogers for Jay Cutler. At which point, Campbell becomes a sunk cost.

Essentially, if I'm predicting correctly we give up two great young players, the chance at two more great young players, and do it all to get one great young player. That's essentially how it's going to break down.
I sure hope you're wrong about Rogers. He's starting to come into his own (minus the dropped INTs) and pairing him with D-Hall makes them both better. This whole thing makes me sick.

HAIL!
__________________
"Baseball is what we were, football is what we have become"
SkinzzFan is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.27488 seconds with 11 queries